
The Rage of War
1971

1947
Director
Vjekoslav Afrić
Runtime
100 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Slavica, Marin and a group of operants hide the newly built ship from the Italian occupation forces. They end up arrested, but the partisans rescue them and they take part in the string of actions.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on wartime mobilization rather than specific non-cisnormative identities. However, its emphasis on communal bonds over traditional romantic hierarchies offers a slight departure from conservative domesticity.
Gender Representation
Women like Slavica are portrayed as active, strategic participants in military resistance. This subverts traditional tropes by presenting female characters as agents of sabotage rather than passive victims.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative promotes a multi-ethnic, pan-regional identity through the Yugoslav Partisan movement. This collective approach challenges singular ethnic nationalism in favor of a unified resistance against occupation.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film critiques imperialist structures by depicting the struggle against Italian occupation. It prioritizes collective values and anti-establishment frameworks over individualist or capitalist interests.
Disability Representation
The story centers on the physical agency required for partisan warfare. There is no evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities being included in the narrative.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Slavica serves as a foundational piece of partisan cinema that replaces the lone hero archetype with a collective, identity-driven resistance. Its primary strength is the subversion of traditional power dynamics through its focus on organized, communal struggle. The film excels in portraying female agency and a multi-ethnic resistance, moving away from the domestic or nationalist tropes common in other war dramas. It effectively uses the setting of the Italian occupation to critique systemic oppression. However, the film lacks contemporary intersectional markers. It does not provide representation for disability or explicit LGBTQ+ identities, remaining constrained by the cinematic standards of the post-war era.

1971

1958

1960

1948

1983

1960

2020

1960

1959

1955

1965

1959
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.