New Showbiz

You are here:
Ivan the Terrible, Part II: The Boyars' Plot

Ivan the Terrible, Part II: The Boyars' Plot

1958

NR

Director

Sergei Eisenstein

Runtime

82 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

This is the second part of a projected three-part epic biopic of Russian Czar Ivan Grozny, undertaken by Soviet film-maker Sergei Eisenstein at the behest of Josef Stalin. Production of the epic was stopped before the third part could be filmed, due to producer dissatisfaction with Eisenstein's introducing forbidden experimental filming techniques into the material, more evident in this part than the first part. As it was, this second part was banned from showings until after the deaths of both Eisenstein and Stalin, and a change of attitude by the subsequent heads of the Soviet government. In this part, as Ivan the Terrible attempts to consolidate his power by establishing a personal army, his political rivals, the Russian boyars, plot to assassinate him.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.0/10

Fair

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film operates within a traditional heteronormative framework. There are no depictions of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy.

Gender Representation

Limited

Narrative agency is centered almost exclusively on male political and military authority. Female characters like Anastasia serve as emotional anchors rather than drivers of the plot.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The cast is ethnically homogeneous, reflecting the demographic reality of 16th-century Muscovy. The story focuses on internal class distinctions rather than ethnic breadth.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The film offers a sophisticated deconstruction of power and feudal hierarchies. It explores the psychological toll of absolute authority and the systemic machinery of the state.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no discernible focus on visible or invisible disabilities. Characters are defined by political status and psychological state rather than physical impairment.

Strengths

  • Provides a sophisticated, non-traditional view of morality and governance.
  • Offers a complex deconstruction of feudal hierarchies and centralized power.
  • Explores the psychological consequences of absolute authority through a nuanced lens.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks representation of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy.
  • Centers political agency almost exclusively on male characters.
  • Features an ethnically homogeneous cast with little intersectional breadth.

AI Analysis

Eisenstein’s work is demographically conservative, focusing on the patriarchal and ethnic homogeneity of 16th-century Russia. It lacks representation for LGBTQ+ identities and disabilities, while gender roles remain strictly hierarchical. However, the film excels in cultural and thematic complexity. It avoids simple hero tropes, instead using experimental techniques to examine the brutal realities of state consolidation and the corruption of the aristocracy. Ultimately, the film trades demographic breadth for a deep, morally relativistic exploration of institutional power and systemic violence.

How are these scores produced? →

Featured in

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.