You are here:
Arabic Numeral Series 12

Arabic Numeral Series 12

1981

Director

Stan Brakhage

Runtime

18 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

This is the twelfth film in the twenty-part Arabics series. Brakhage creates blurry visual fields that are profoundly without ground, worlds of unidentifiable, ever-shifting shapes, and oceans of light and darkness.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

0.0/10

Minimal


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film contains no characters or interpersonal dynamics. As a purely formalist work, it lacks any depiction of sexual orientation or gender identity.

Gender Representation

Minimal

This work operates entirely outside human representation. It does not engage with gender hierarchies because it lacks human subjects.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The film utilizes blurry visual fields and shifting shapes rather than representational imagery. Consequently, it features no racial or ethnic casting.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Minimal

The film bypasses cultural, religious, or political frameworks through a focus on light and rhythm. It avoids promoting any specific institutional identity.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There are no depictions of neurodivergence or physical ability. The focus remains on the mechanics of light rather than lived human experiences.

Strengths

  • The film disrupts mainstream visual hierarchies by rejecting the standard Hollywood gaze.
  • It provides a radical departure from traditional narrative structures through pure sensory experience.

Areas for Improvement

  • The abstract nature of the work prevents any engagement with identity-based representation.
  • The lack of human subjects means the film cannot address or subvert social hierarchies.

AI Analysis

Stan Brakhage’s *Arabic Numeral Series 12* is a work of pure formalist abstraction. It prioritizes sensory experience and rhythmic light over traditional cinematic grammar or narrative structure. Because the film eschews representational imagery, it lacks the semiotic tools—such as character agency or dialogue—needed to address identity. It does not engage in sociopolitical storytelling or the subversion of identity-based tropes. Ultimately, the film exists outside the human social contract, focusing on unidentifiable shapes and oceans of darkness rather than human subjects.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.