You are here:
One-Two, Soldiers Were Going...

One-Two, Soldiers Were Going...

1976

Director

Leonid Bykov

Runtime

87 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

The families of 18 soldiers who heroically died in 1944 are meeting at the place of the squad last battle.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.2/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film operates within a traditional mid-20th-century dramatic framework. There is no evidence of non-cisnormative gender identities or depictions of same-sex intimacy.

Gender Representation

Minimal

The narrative is almost exclusively male-centric, focusing on military command and soldierly brotherhood. Women appear primarily as symbols of the domestic sphere or mourning, reinforcing passive roles.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The cast reflects the diverse ethnic makeup of the USSR. This integrates various ethnic identities within the unified struggle of the Red Army, disrupting monolithic Western wartime views.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film prioritizes collectivist values and the shared sacrifice of the working class. It functions as an anti-fascist narrative that emphasizes systemic, communal resilience over individual glory.

Disability Representation

Limited

Representation is limited to physical trauma and combat injuries. These depictions highlight the grim realities of war but function as markers of sacrifice rather than exploring individual agency.

Strengths

  • Reflects the multi-ethnic composition of the USSR through a diverse cast.
  • Subverts individualistic hero tropes by centering the collective soldier experience.
  • Emphasizes communal resilience and the shared struggle of the working class.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative gender expressions.
  • Women are relegated to passive, symbolic roles rather than agentic characters.
  • Disability is treated as a marker of combat sacrifice rather than individual agency.

AI Analysis

Leonid Bykov’s work centers on the psychological realism of the common soldier, prioritizing the collective experience over individualistic heroics. The film succeeds in portraying the multi-ethnic composition of the Soviet Union, offering a nuanced view of a unified, diverse front during wartime. However, the film is heavily constrained by the social hierarchies of its era. It lacks modern intersectional markers, particularly regarding LGBTQ+ identities and gender agency. Women are relegated to the periphery, serving mostly as symbols of domesticity or loss. Ultimately, the film is a study in collectivism. While it lacks contemporary diversity standards, it subverts traditional 'hero' tropes by focusing on the shared struggle and communal bonds of a diverse group of soldiers.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.