New Showbiz

You are here:
It's a Big Country

It's a Big Country

1951

NR

Director

Don Weis, John Sturges, Charles Vidor, Richard Thorpe, Clarence Brown, William A. Wellman, Don Hartman

Runtime

89 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Comprised of eight unrelated episodes of inconsistent quality, this anthology piece of American propaganda features some of MGM Studios' best directors, screenwriters and actors; it is narrated by Louis Calhern. Stories are framed by the lecture of a university professor. In one tale a Boston resident becomes angry when the census forgets to record her presence. Another sketch chronicles the achievements of African Americans while still another pays tongue-in-cheek tribute to Texas.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.9/10

Fair

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film lacks documented LGBTQ+ characters or non-heteronormative narratives. It appears to adhere to the standard social constraints regarding sexuality typical of 1951 studio productions.

Gender Representation

Fair

One segment focuses on a Boston resident contesting her omission from the census, highlighting female visibility in civic structures. However, female agency remains largely confined to traditional mid-century frameworks.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Good

A dedicated segment chronicles the achievements of African Americans. This intentional inclusion provides a platform for racial narrative depth that moves beyond mere tokenism for the era.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The film uses a university lecture as a framing device, introducing a secular academic lens. Satirical elements, such as a tribute to Texas, provide a nuanced view of American identity.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no discernible evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities within the vignettes.

Strengths

  • Includes a dedicated segment chronicling African American achievements and historical agency.
  • Utilizes satire and a tongue-in-cheek tone to explore regional American identities.
  • Employs a secular, academic framing device that mitigates traditionalist religious undertones.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks any documented representation of LGBTQ+ characters or narratives.
  • Provides no discernible portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities.
  • Female roles appear limited to traditional mid-century social frameworks.

AI Analysis

This anthology film functions as a transitional piece of mid-century cinema. It maintains many traditional social hierarchies while offering segmented glimpses of demographic diversity through its disparate vignettes. The inclusion of African American achievements provides a significant boost to the film's racial representation. This intentionality distinguishes the work from more homogeneous contemporary productions. While the film lacks LGBTQ+ and disability representation, its use of satire and academic framing offers a more complex view of American identity than standard propaganda of the period.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.