
The Gleaners and I: Two Years Later
2002

1982
Director
Agnès Varda
Runtime
82 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Venturing from Venice Beach to Watts, Varda looks at the murals of LA as backdrop to and mirror of the city’s many cultures. She casts a curious eye on graffiti and photorealism, roller disco & gang violence, evangelical Christians, Hare Krishnas, artists, angels and ordinary Angelenos.
Overall Score
Good
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film captures the fluid social textures of 1980s Los Angeles. It avoids a centralized queer narrative, instead treating non-traditional identities as natural components of the city's mosaic.
Gender Representation
Varda subverts traditional hierarchies by centering a female gaze on the urban environment. The film avoids the typical male gaze, focusing instead on women's agency within artistic and social spheres.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film excels by refusing to treat Los Angeles as a monolithic Anglo-Saxon space. It provides high agency to characters of color through their murals and presence in diverse ethnic enclaves.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
A pluralistic view of spirituality is presented, juxtaposing belief systems like Hare Krishnas and evangelicalism. This approach avoids endorsing a singular Western or Christian orthodoxy.
Disability Representation
Specific depictions of disability are less centralized within this broad sociological survey. However, the film offers a nuanced view of how individuals navigate physical space and human vulnerability.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Agnès Varda’s documentary uses the murals of Los Angeles to explore the intersection of public art and private identity. By moving from Venice Beach to Watts, the film captures a wide array of subcultures, from roller disco enthusiasts to evangelical Christians. The work succeeds by treating diverse cultural expressions as the primary drivers of the city's identity rather than mere spectacles. It effectively deconstructs traditional urban hierarchies through a decentralized, grassroots perspective. While the film provides a rich tapestry of racial and cultural variety, it lacks a centralized focus on specific disability narratives. Nevertheless, it remains a sophisticated study of postmodern subjectivity and urban life.

2002

1958

1963

1978

2019

1986

1967

1958

1983

2014

1997

1998
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.