You are here:

The Round-Up

The Round-Up

Representation Score

2.5/10

Limited

1966

Director

Miklós Jancsó

Runtime

91 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The Round-Up is a historical drama that emphasizes systemic critique over individual character development. Its demographic diversity is limited by its 19th-century Hungarian setting, leading to low scores for gender and LGBTQ+ representation. However, the film excels in cultural representation. It avoids simplistic heroic clichés, instead offering a sophisticated deconstruction of how revolutionary movements can mirror the oppressive structures they aim to replace. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its intellectual engagement with power dynamics rather than its breadth of human identity representation.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does The Round-Up have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film follows a traditional framework that assumes everyone is straight or cisgender. There is no representation of non-straight or non-cisgender identities.

How does The Round-Up portray gender?

Limited

The story focuses on a male-dominated military structure. Women are shown mostly as passive subjects or part of the peasantry.

How racially and ethnically diverse is The Round-Up?

Fair

The cast is ethnically uniform, reflecting the 1848 Hungarian setting. However, the struggle against imperial power offers a subtle look at ethnic identity.

How does The Round-Up represent religion and culture?

Excellent

Jancsó critiques institutional power through moral relativism. Political institutions and 'righteous' authority are portrayed as inherently flawed and cyclical.

Does The Round-Up include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no significant representation of characters with visible or invisible disabilities.

Present on Screen

  • Sophisticated critique of Western-style institutional power and systemic oppression.
  • Profound moral relativism that challenges conventional 'heroic' revolutionary narratives.
  • Intellectual engagement with the cyclical nature of political authority.

Limited or Absent

  • Focus remains almost exclusively on male military hierarchies, limiting gender diversity.
  • No representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisgender characters.
  • Specific regional and temporal constraints limit ethnic variety.

Official Synopsis

After the failure of the Kossuth's revolution of 1848, people suspected of supporting the revolution are sent to prison camps. Years later, partisans led by outlaw Sándor Rózsa still run rampant. Although the authorities do not know the identities of the partisans, they round up suspects and try to root them out by any means necessary.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.