Rome, Open City
1945
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.4 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
The Young Guard
1948
Director
Sergei Gerasimov
Runtime
189 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
In 1942, local teenagers are organizing the underground resistance in the city of Krasnodon during the Nazi occupation of Russia. The teens manage to outsmart the Nazis in their fight, and their activity lifts the spirits of the surviving citizens.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
5.8/10
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film operates within a strictly heteronormative framework. There are no depictions of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy, focusing instead on revolutionary solidarity.
Gender Representation
Women are presented as high-agency participants in the resistance. They function as intelligence gatherers and combatants, demonstrating bravery equal to their male counterparts.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
Casting is ethnically homogeneous, reflecting the Slavic demographic of the Krasnodon region. It accurately reflects the historical context without utilizing multi-ethnic representation.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative prioritizes collective strength and explicitly promotes secularism. It frames the struggle as a triumph of the organized working class against an oppressive force.
Disability Representation
There is no discernible representation of physical or neurodivergent disabilities. Characters are defined by their physical capacity for resistance and labor.
Strengths
- Women are depicted as active, high-agency combatants and intelligence gatherers.
- The film successfully elevates female characters to central, plot-driving roles.
- Strong emphasis on collective strength and the power of the organized working class.
Areas for Improvement
- Complete absence of LGBTQ+ representation or non-cisnormative identities.
- Lack of representation for physical or neurodivergent disabilities.
- The cast is ethnically homogeneous, lacking multi-ethnic diversity.
AI Analysis
The film excels at subverting traditional gender hierarchies by placing women in central, active roles within the resistance. This agency elevates female characters from domestic figures to essential drivers of the plot. However, the work is limited by its narrow demographic focus and lack of representation for LGBTQ+ identities or disabilities. The casting remains ethnically homogeneous, adhering strictly to the regional Slavic context of the era. Culturally, the film is a powerful expression of collective, anti-capitalist values. It replaces individualist heroism with a narrative of systemic, state-aligned mobilization and secular discipline.
Similar Movies
The Battle of the Rails
1946
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.1 out of 10
Secret Mission
1950
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.0 out of 10
The Barefoot Battalion
1953
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.0 out of 10
Pastorale 1943
1978
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.7 out of 10
The Four Days of Naples
1962
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.2 out of 10
The District Secretary
1942
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.9 out of 10
The Road Home
1946
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.4 out of 10
The Farm in the Small Marsh
1976
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.1 out of 10
Carve Her Name with Pride
1958
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.4 out of 10
Wolves' Lairs
1948
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.8 out of 10
Attention! Bandits!
1951
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.3 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.