Scattergood Pulls the Strings
1941
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
Country Gentlemen
1936
ApprovedDirector
Ralph Staub
Runtime
66 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
After being run out of town after town for trying to sell worthless stock, two con artists breeze into the small town of Chesterville, where they find themselves accused of kidnapping a young boy to whom they offered a ride. When that misunderstanding is cleared up, the two conmen hatch a plot to unload all their worthless paper on the gullible citizens of Chesterville.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
2.6/10
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks any depiction of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy. It operates within the heteronormative constraints typical of the 1930s.
Gender Representation
The plot is driven by two male protagonists acting as rogue tricksters. There is no evidence of female characters possessing significant agency or subverting traditional hierarchies.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative appears to reflect the homogeneous social structures of 1936. It adheres to the era's standard of depicting a largely Anglo-Saxon social norm.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story relies on a classic small-town versus outsider dynamic. It focuses on individual morality and restorative social order rather than critiquing systemic institutions.
Disability Representation
There is no information regarding the inclusion of characters with visible or invisible disabilities.
Strengths
- The film utilizes a classic, engaging 'small-town vs. outsider' comedic dynamic.
Areas for Improvement
- The narrative lacks female agency and diverse character identities.
- The film adheres to the homogeneous social norms of its era.
- There is no engagement with intersectional or non-traditional themes.
AI Analysis
Country Gentlemen is a conventional 1930s comedy that prioritizes traditional comedic tropes over narrative complexity. The story centers on two male con artists navigating small-town misunderstandings, which reinforces established masculine archetypes of the era. The film lacks intentional engagement with intersectional themes. Instead, it adheres to the demographic hierarchies and social norms prevalent in mid-1930s American cinema, focusing on individual scams rather than broader social critiques. Because the film functions as a standard period piece, it offers little in the way of diverse representation or subversion of the status quo.
Similar Movies
Jitterbugs
1943
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.4 out of 10
Dance with Me, Henry
1956
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10
Times Square Playboy
1936
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10
The Cat's-Paw
1934
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10
The Fixer Uppers
1935
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10
Scram!
1932
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.9 out of 10
Every Day's a Holiday
1937
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.7 out of 10
Cash
1933
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.2 out of 10
Money Squawks
1940
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10
Let's Make a Million
1936
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10
Night Owls
1930
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.4 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.