You are here:

How to Save a Marriage and Ruin Your Life

How to Save a Marriage and Ruin Your Life

Representation Score

2.1/10

Limited

1968

PG-13

Director

Fielder Cook

Runtime

102 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The film follows the conventions of a mid-century comedy of errors centered on marital infidelity. It adheres to the social norms of the time, lacking significant representation of racial or LGBTQ+ identities. However, it offers a nuanced subversion of gender roles by giving female characters a significant role in driving the story in the latter part of the story. Ultimately, the work prioritizes interpersonal domestic comedy over broader systemic critiques, staying true to the traditional casting and narrative conventions of its era.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does How to Save a Marriage and Ruin Your Life have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film centers on heterosexual relationships and infidelity, with no indication of queer subtext or non-cisgender identities.

How does How to Save a Marriage and Ruin Your Life portray gender?

Fair

Initially focused on male-driven schemes, the narrative shifts to give the women significant roles. Carol and Muriel evolve from passive objects to active agents who unite against the men.

How racially and ethnically diverse is How to Save a Marriage and Ruin Your Life?

Limited

The cast is predominantly white, with no visible efforts to include diverse ethnic backgrounds.

How does How to Save a Marriage and Ruin Your Life represent religion and culture?

Fair

The story critiques traditional marriage through infidelity and dysfunction, focusing on social norms rather than a broader systemic critique.

Does How to Save a Marriage and Ruin Your Life include disability representation?

Minimal

There are no characters with visible or invisible disabilities, and disability is not used as a narrative device.

Present on Screen

  • The narrative provides a moderate subversion of gender hierarchies by shifting ability to act to female characters.
  • The film explores female solidarity through the protagonists' decision to team up against the men.

Limited or Absent

  • The film lacks racial and ethnic diversity, reflecting the limited casting conventions of its time.
  • There is no representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisgender characters.
  • The story lacks any depiction of characters with disabilities.

Official Synopsis

Wealthy playboy David Sloane wrongly believes good girl Carol Corman is his best friend's mistress.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.