You are here:
The Seven Deadly Sins

The Seven Deadly Sins

1962

Director

Jean-Luc Godard, Sylvain Dhomme, Philippe de Broca, Claude Chabrol, Jacques Demy, Roger Vadim, Édouard Molinaro

Runtime

113 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Seven directors each dramatize one of the seven deadly sins in a short film. In "Anger," a domestic argument over a fly in the Sunday soup escalates into nuclear war. In "Sloth," a movie star would rather pay someone to tie his shoe than bend over to do it himself, and he can't be bothered to accept a starlet's sexual favors. In "Gluttony," a peasant family on its way to the funeral of a relative who died from indigestion stops regularly to eat and drink en route, arriving in time to eat some more. In "Greed," a high-class prostitute refunds the price of a cadet's lottery ticket. In "Pride," an unfaithful wife finds reason to reform. And so on through lust and envy.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.3/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film lacks explicit depictions of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy. Vignettes focus on traditional romantic and sexual tensions that align with 1960s heteronormative social structures.

Gender Representation

Fair

Women are often depicted through traditional archetypes tied to male desire or domestic conflict. However, some characters, like the prostitute in 'Greed,' demonstrate a degree of financial agency.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

Casting is largely homogeneous, reflecting the contemporary French cinematic landscape. The segments do not actively seek to disrupt Eurocentric norms through diverse ethnic ensembles.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film excels at deconstructing Western institutions by using sins as satirical tools rather than religious mandates. It promotes moral relativism and critiques capitalist impulses through irony.

Disability Representation

Limited

There is no significant or intentional representation of visible or invisible disabilities. Characters are defined by moral failings rather than physical or neurodivergent experiences.

Strengths

  • Sophisticated narrative architecture that deconstructs traditional moral frameworks.
  • Intellectual subversion through the use of satire and moral relativism.
  • Effective critique of social hierarchies and capitalist impulses.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of explicit representation for LGBTQ+ identities and non-cisnormative characters.
  • Homogeneous casting that reflects a limited, Eurocentric cinematic landscape.
  • Minimal inclusion of characters with visible or invisible disabilities.

AI Analysis

This anthology film functions as a postmodern critique of human nature, utilizing the distinct voices of French New Wave directors to shift focus from theology to social observation. While it lacks demographic breadth, it offers significant intellectual subversion. The work's strength lies in its narrative architecture, which uses satire to challenge the stability of traditional social and religious institutions. It treats morality as a subject for psychological scrutiny rather than absolute truth. However, the film remains rooted in the social norms of its era, showing limited representation of LGBTQ+ identities, diverse ethnicities, or disability. Its impact is more intellectual and systemic than demographic.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.