
The Magnificent Seven Deadly Sins
1971

1962
Director
Jean-Luc Godard, Sylvain Dhomme, Philippe de Broca, Claude Chabrol, Jacques Demy, Roger Vadim, Édouard Molinaro
Runtime
113 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Seven directors each dramatize one of the seven deadly sins in a short film. In "Anger," a domestic argument over a fly in the Sunday soup escalates into nuclear war. In "Sloth," a movie star would rather pay someone to tie his shoe than bend over to do it himself, and he can't be bothered to accept a starlet's sexual favors. In "Gluttony," a peasant family on its way to the funeral of a relative who died from indigestion stops regularly to eat and drink en route, arriving in time to eat some more. In "Greed," a high-class prostitute refunds the price of a cadet's lottery ticket. In "Pride," an unfaithful wife finds reason to reform. And so on through lust and envy.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks explicit depictions of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy. Vignettes focus on traditional romantic and sexual tensions that align with 1960s heteronormative social structures.
Gender Representation
Women are often depicted through traditional archetypes tied to male desire or domestic conflict. However, some characters, like the prostitute in 'Greed,' demonstrate a degree of financial agency.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
Casting is largely homogeneous, reflecting the contemporary French cinematic landscape. The segments do not actively seek to disrupt Eurocentric norms through diverse ethnic ensembles.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film excels at deconstructing Western institutions by using sins as satirical tools rather than religious mandates. It promotes moral relativism and critiques capitalist impulses through irony.
Disability Representation
There is no significant or intentional representation of visible or invisible disabilities. Characters are defined by moral failings rather than physical or neurodivergent experiences.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
This anthology film functions as a postmodern critique of human nature, utilizing the distinct voices of French New Wave directors to shift focus from theology to social observation. While it lacks demographic breadth, it offers significant intellectual subversion. The work's strength lies in its narrative architecture, which uses satire to challenge the stability of traditional social and religious institutions. It treats morality as a subject for psychological scrutiny rather than absolute truth. However, the film remains rooted in the social norms of its era, showing limited representation of LGBTQ+ identities, diverse ethnicities, or disability. Its impact is more intellectual and systemic than demographic.

1971

1964

1972

1997

1968

1975

1966

1948

1957

1976

1962

1954
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.