You are here:
As Long as You've Got Your Health

As Long as You've Got Your Health

1966

Not Rated

Director

Pierre Étaix

Runtime

68 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

An anthology film consisting of four stories. (1) A man reads a Dracula novel while in bed, but cannot seem to tell the novel from reality, causing sleep troubles. (2) A man cannot escape the absurd ads he saw at the movie theater that day. (3) A polluted and construction-ridden town keeps everybody on edge, sending one man to the doctor. (4) A hunter, a farmer and a couple on a picnic unknowingly cause continuous trouble for one another.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.1/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film lacks explicit LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. The anthology focuses on individual psychological states and situational comedy rather than non-heteronormative identities.

Gender Representation

Fair

Narratives center on individual experiences like sleep deprivation or urban frustration. While a couple appears in one segment, there is little evidence of gendered power dynamics.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The setting reflects a traditional mid-century European milieu. The cast appears to align with the demographic norms of 1960s French cinema without visible intersectional casting.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The film critiques modern institutions, specifically through a segment on urban pollution and construction. It views industrialization as a source of societal tension and individual distress.

Disability Representation

Fair

One vignette explores psychological distress and altered consciousness through a man unable to distinguish fiction from reality. The film's approach to these mental states remains largely unexamined.

Strengths

  • Offers a critique of modern societal stressors and the disruption caused by industrialization.
  • Explores themes of psychological distress and the fragmentation of perception through surrealist comedy.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-heteronormative narratives.
  • Does not feature diverse racial or ethnic casting beyond mid-century European norms.
  • Provides little evidence of subverting traditional gender hierarchies or exploring complex gendered dynamics.

AI Analysis

Pierre Étaix’s surrealist comedy prioritizes stylistic experimentation and the absurdity of the human condition over identity-driven narratives. As a period piece from 1966, the film operates within the conventional demographic frameworks of its era. The anthology structure focuses on vignettes regarding psychological states and societal stressors, such as urban pollution. This results in a work that critiques modern progress but lacks specific intersectional representation. Ultimately, the film's low scores reflect a lack of diverse casting and a focus on absurdist tropes rather than complex studies of identity or social hierarchy.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.