You are here:
The Devil and the Ten Commandments

The Devil and the Ten Commandments

1962

Director

Julien Duvivier

Runtime

120 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

The film consists of seven roughly 15 minute episodes, each showing what will happen if one or more of the Ten Commandments will be broken: Jérome Chambard is warned that he will lose his job if he continues to swear; Françoise Beaufort enamored of a stripper calls on her only to find her married to a janitor who doesn't know what kind of dancing his wife performs; Denis, a Jesuit novice, leaves the order to avenge his sister's suicide, which was provoked by Garigny, who seduced her into prostitution and drug addiction; Philip buys a necklace for Micheline though he is bored with her; a young man find out that his real mother is not Madeleine, but actress Clarisse Ardant; Didier Marin, cashier of a bank, was fired by his boss; the Devil appears as a serpent for Jérome Chambard and the bishop are eating.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.3/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film lacks explicit depictions of LGBTQ+ identities. The narrative focuses on traditional romantic entanglements and familial disruptions rather than non-heteronormative relationships.

Gender Representation

Fair

Vignettes engage with gendered social roles through a traditional lens. While it critiques patriarchal exploitation, female agency is often framed by its impact on male protagonists.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The production reflects a homogeneous European social structure. There is no evidence of racial blending or non-white casting within these domestic social vignettes.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film explores moral relativism by using a Devil figure to examine human transgression. It presents a skeptical view of traditional sanctity and religious institutions.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no information regarding the depiction of physical or neurodivergent disabilities in the film.

Strengths

  • Offers a nuanced, non-idealized view of social institutions and traditional sanctity.
  • Explores complex themes of human transgression, drug addiction, and economic instability.
  • Provides a skeptical, realistic critique of moralistic storytelling through its cynical narrative architecture.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks visible representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-heteronormative relationships.
  • Displays a homogeneous European cast with minimal racial or ethnic diversity.
  • Frames female agency primarily through the lens of male protagonists' reactions.

AI Analysis

The film functions as a cynical social critique of human fallibility rather than a diverse tapestry of identities. It prioritizes the exploration of moral decay and systemic failure over intersectional representation. While the anthology format allows for varied social themes, the perspectives remain largely centered on a homogeneous European demographic. The narrative often uses female characters as catalysts for male emotional arcs, limiting independent female agency. Ultimately, the work's strength lies in its refusal to present a sanitized view of morality, opting instead to highlight the breakdown of institutional authority and the consequences of human error.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.