New Showbiz

You are here:
Ro.Go.Pa.G.

Ro.Go.Pa.G.

1963

Not Rated

Director

Roberto Rossellini, Jean-Luc Godard, Pier Paolo Pasolini, Ugo Gregoretti

Runtime

122 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Four short films by four different directors dealing with the principles of modern life.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.3/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The anthology lacks explicit LGBTQ+ narratives or clearly defined non-heteronormative identities. While the directors often explored sexual liberation, these segments focus on broader sexual mores and urban desire rather than specific queer identities.

Gender Representation

Good

The film deconstructs traditional gender roles through satire and stylized romantic interactions. Gregoretti critiques the objectification of women, while Godard moves away from stable provider archetypes to present more fluid dynamics.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The setting focuses heavily on the Italian working class and urban proletariat. While Pasolini explores marginalized social identities through the sub-proletariat, the cast lacks significant racial or non-Anglo-Saxon diversity.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The film excels at critiquing consumerism and capitalist structures. It embraces moral relativism, prioritizing the depiction of social fragmentation over traditional Christian or religious authority frameworks.

Disability Representation

Limited

There is no meaningful or agentic portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities. The narrative focus remains centered on class, gender, and the psychological pressures of urban life.

Strengths

  • Strong intellectual subversion of Western bourgeois values and traditional social hierarchies.
  • Effective satirical critique of the male gaze and the objectification of women.
  • Profound exploration of the breakdown of traditional religious and family authority.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of significant racial or non-Anglo-Saxon diversity within the cast.
  • Absence of meaningful or agentic portrayals of physical or neurodivergent disabilities.
  • Minimal explicit representation of specific LGBTQ+ identities or narratives.

AI Analysis

Ro.Go.Pa.G. functions as a fragmented, postmodern meditation on 1960s Italy. Its strength lies in its intellectual subversion, using a high-pedigree directorial lineup to deconstruct bourgeois values and traditional narrative authority. The film succeeds in its systemic critique of institutions and gendered objectification. It effectively uses satire to challenge the status quo and the homogenizing effects of modern consumerism. However, the work lacks diversity in terms of racial representation and disability. It also misses opportunities for explicit LGBTQ+ storytelling, focusing instead on broader social shifts and class dynamics.

How are these scores produced? →

Featured in

  • Best Religious & Cultural Representation in Film

Similar Movies

Movie poster for Roma

Roma

1972

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.3 out of 10

A Boring Afternoon

1965

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.9 out of 10

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.