
The Long Day of the Massacre
1968

1966
Director
Alberto Cardone
Runtime
104 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Johnny Liston has just been released from prison where he has wrongly served twelve years for a murder. He returns to Campos, the village of his birth, where the whole town is terrorized by Johnny's brother, Sartana, who has taken Manuela, Johnny's fiancèe to be his lover. With his only friend a mute, Johnny must seize all opportunity to find out why he was framed, who was involved and why he is not welcome. source: SWDB www.spaghetti-western.net
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on traditional interpersonal conflicts between brothers. There are no depictions of non-cisnormative identities or narratives that critique heteronormativity.
Gender Representation
Male protagonists drive the narrative through physical conflict and pursuit of agency. Manuela serves as a central motivation for the hero but lacks independent agency.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film disrupts Western tropes by utilizing a colonial African setting. African protagonists and resistance fighters serve as the primary drivers of the plot.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative functions as a critique of Western institutional power. It frames colonial administration as an antagonistic force within an anti-imperialist framework.
Disability Representation
A mute companion provides a character with a communicative disability. This character functions primarily as a loyal sidekick rather than a fully realized individual.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Alberto Cardone’s film is a striking subversion of the Spaghetti Western genre. While it relies on traditional gender hierarchies and lacks LGBTQ+ representation, it replaces the standard American frontier with a colonial African landscape. This shift allows for a sophisticated critique of imperialist structures. The film excels by centering Black agency and resistance against oppressive colonial administrations. This departure from the homogeneous casting typical of the era provides significant racial and cultural depth. However, the film remains tethered to 1960s genre conventions regarding gender and disability. Female characters act as catalysts for male action, and disability is used largely as narrative shorthand for a loyal sidekick.

1968

1967

1967

1971

1966

1975

1969

1967

1971

1956

1969

1970
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.