You are here:
The Traitors

The Traitors

1973

Director

Raymundo Gleyzer

Runtime

113 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Based on a true story, the film narrates the life of a fictitious Peronist union leader who, after years of militancy, gains power in the union during the 1960s and gradually becomes a corrupt bureaucrat.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.6/10

Good


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks documented LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisnormative identities. The narrative focus remains strictly on class struggle and socioeconomic mobilization.

Gender Representation

Fair

Women are depicted as active participants in political organization and survival. The film avoids submissive tropes by integrating their domestic and labor-related lives into the broader struggle.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Excellent

The film excels by centering the rural proletariat and marginalized laborers. Using non-professional actors from the working class provides authentic agency to the subjects.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The narrative offers a profound critique of capitalist land ownership and Western institutions. It prioritizes collective organization and class-based identity over individualist ideals.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no specific evidence regarding the portrayal of neurodivergence or disabilities as central narrative arcs. The film focuses on the physical realities of labor instead.

Strengths

  • Authentic portrayal of the rural proletariat through non-professional working-class actors.
  • Strong critique of capitalist land ownership and traditional Western power structures.
  • Meaningful depiction of women as active political participants rather than submissive tropes.

Areas for Improvement

  • Complete absence of LGBTQ+ representation or non-cisnormative gender identities.
  • Lack of focus on neurodivergence or specific disability narratives.

AI Analysis

The Traitors serves as a powerful piece of cinematic resistance, utilizing a Third Cinema framework to critique colonial and class-based structures. It succeeds by centering the marginalized through authentic, agency-driven portrayals of the working class. While the film achieves high marks for its radical deconstruction of class hierarchies and cultural critique, it lacks representation in the LGBTQ+ and disability sectors. These omissions prevent a higher overall score despite its socio-political depth. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its intentionality. By prioritizing the voices of the proletariat over traditional spectacle, it challenges the hegemony of Western socio-economic structures.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.