
Macaroni
1985

1989
Director
Ettore Scola
Runtime
110 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Splendor is the name of an old movie theater managed by Jordan (Mastroianni), who inherited it from his father. The theater is in decay and only generates debts and trouble, but Jordan gets aid in his almost quixotian quest from projectionist Luigi (Troisi) and ushurette Chantale (Vlady). However, Jordan is finally forced to sell the Splendor to businessman Lo Fazio (Piperno), which plans to transform it in some kind of furniture store. When Jordan leaves the theater for the last time (the very first scene), he recalls the glorious days of Splendor and movies in general.
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks queer narratives or non-heteronormative identities. While it avoids derogatory tropes, the story focuses on economic survival rather than exploring sexual identity.
Gender Representation
Women are depicted with agency through their professional struggles in the entertainment industry. The film highlights their resilience and dignity within a male-dominated landscape.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
Set in 1930s Italy, the cast reflects the demographic homogeneity of the era. The narrative lacks intersectional racial dynamics or color-blind casting.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film offers a sharp critique of Fascism and the rise of consumer capitalism. It explores how political and commercial shifts erode cultural heritage.
Disability Representation
There are no prominent depictions of physical or neurodivergent disabilities. Characters face socioeconomic marginalization rather than specific disability-focused narratives.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Splendor is a historical eulogy for communal cinema that prioritizes political and institutional critique over demographic variety. It succeeds in portraying the professional resilience of women and the crushing weight of totalitarianism on the arts. However, the film remains limited by its historical setting, offering very little in the way of racial, LGBTQ+, or disability representation. The narrative focuses on the economic and social decay of a theater rather than diverse identity politics. Ultimately, the film is a study of systemic oppression and the loss of cultural identity, making it a sophisticated social commentary despite its narrow demographic scope.

1985

1990

1958

2005

1996

1984

1981

1971

1983

1991

1972

1988
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.