You are here:
Very Nice, Very Nice

Very Nice, Very Nice

1961

NR

Director

Arthur Lipsett

Runtime

7 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Arthur Lipsett's first film is an avant-garde blend of photography and sound. It looks behind the business-as-usual face we put on life and shows anxieties we want to forget. It is made of dozens of pictures that seem familiar, with fragments of speech heard in passing and, between times, a voice saying, "Very nice, very nice." The film was nominated for an Oscar for Best Live Action Short Film.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.5/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks any discernible depiction of LGBTQ+ identities or romantic orientations. Its experimental montage format avoids character-driven narratives or interpersonal dynamics.

Gender Representation

Limited

Lipsett avoids traditional gender hierarchies by refusing to establish characters. Human figures serve as rhythmic textures rather than agents of masculinity or femininity.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The film captures a broad, anonymous spectrum of the urban population through newsreel fragments. It reflects a globalized industrial presence without intentional thematic explorations of race.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The film offers a sophisticated critique of capitalist order and modern institutional structures. It uses a cut-up technique to highlight the emptiness of industrial society.

Disability Representation

Fair

There is no specific focus on physical or neurodivergent identities. However, the sensory overload mirrors the experience of navigating a fractured, hyper-stimulated environment.

Strengths

  • Provides a sophisticated deconstruction of capitalist order and modern institutional structures.
  • Uses innovative montage techniques to challenge traditional Western narratives of stability and progress.
  • Effectively captures the textures of a diverse, globalized, and industrial human presence.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks intentional, intersectional casting or thematic explorations of specific ethnic identities.
  • Does not feature character-driven narratives to explore gendered agency or queer identities.
  • Provides no specific representation of physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

AI Analysis

Arthur Lipsett’s avant-garde short functions as a cinematic deconstruction of mid-20th-century industrial life. By utilizing found footage and sound collage, the film disrupts the cohesive facade of modern society to examine urban alienation. While the work lacks traditional demographic representation or character-driven narratives, it excels in its cultural critique. The film's strength lies in its radical subversion of Western industrial norms and its postmodernist approach to systemic chaos. Ultimately, the film prioritizes sensory and psychological fragmentation over social identity. It serves more as a critique of institutional structures than a study of specific human demographics.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.