
21-87
1963

1961
NRDirector
Arthur Lipsett
Runtime
7 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Arthur Lipsett's first film is an avant-garde blend of photography and sound. It looks behind the business-as-usual face we put on life and shows anxieties we want to forget. It is made of dozens of pictures that seem familiar, with fragments of speech heard in passing and, between times, a voice saying, "Very nice, very nice." The film was nominated for an Oscar for Best Live Action Short Film.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks any discernible depiction of LGBTQ+ identities or romantic orientations. Its experimental montage format avoids character-driven narratives or interpersonal dynamics.
Gender Representation
Lipsett avoids traditional gender hierarchies by refusing to establish characters. Human figures serve as rhythmic textures rather than agents of masculinity or femininity.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film captures a broad, anonymous spectrum of the urban population through newsreel fragments. It reflects a globalized industrial presence without intentional thematic explorations of race.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film offers a sophisticated critique of capitalist order and modern institutional structures. It uses a cut-up technique to highlight the emptiness of industrial society.
Disability Representation
There is no specific focus on physical or neurodivergent identities. However, the sensory overload mirrors the experience of navigating a fractured, hyper-stimulated environment.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Arthur Lipsett’s avant-garde short functions as a cinematic deconstruction of mid-20th-century industrial life. By utilizing found footage and sound collage, the film disrupts the cohesive facade of modern society to examine urban alienation. While the work lacks traditional demographic representation or character-driven narratives, it excels in its cultural critique. The film's strength lies in its radical subversion of Western industrial norms and its postmodernist approach to systemic chaos. Ultimately, the film prioritizes sensory and psychological fragmentation over social identity. It serves more as a critique of institutional structures than a study of specific human demographics.

1963

1981

1970

1957

1982

1970

1970

1967

1971

1966
1957

1973
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.