New Showbiz

You are here:
1 P.M.

1 P.M.

1971

Director

D. A. Pennebaker, Jean-Luc Godard, Richard Leacock

Runtime

95 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Lighter and livelier than the films Jean-Luc Godard had made in France, his U.S. collaboration with Direct Cinema documentarian D. A. Pennebaker was meant to be One A.M., as in “one American movie”; but Godard quit the project and the U.S., where to his dismay he discovered that revolution wasn’t imminent, and Pennebaker edited Godard’s material, to which he and Richard Leacock even added a bit more, releasing the result as One P.M., as in “one parallel movie.” It’s a stunning mixture of cinéma-vérité, political theater, and interviews of key sixties figures.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.7/10

Fair

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film acts as a fragmented mosaic of urban life. It lacks explicit evidence of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy as central themes within the montage.

Gender Representation

Fair

A cinéma-vérité approach grants women agency through direct interviews. However, the lack of cohesive narrative prevents the film from actively subverting gender roles through character development.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Good

The documentary avoids a homogeneous view by capturing New York's diverse racial and ethnic identities. It reflects the city's intersectional reality during a period of intense social transition.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The film functions as a critique of Western hegemony and institutional power. It prioritizes anti-capitalist sentiments and deconstructs official history through a non-linear lens.

Disability Representation

Fair

Representation of neurodivergence or physical disability is not evident. These elements remain incidental to the broader social montage rather than being a deliberate focus.

Strengths

  • Provides significant visibility to diverse racial and ethnic identities within the New York landscape.
  • Challenges Western hegemony by prioritizing anti-establishment and anti-capitalist voices.
  • Decentralizes the male gaze by granting women agency through direct, democratic interviews.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks explicit, central character arcs for LGBTQ+ identities.
  • Fails to provide deliberate or agentic portrayals of individuals with disabilities.
  • Does not actively subvert gender roles through structured character development.

AI Analysis

1 P.M. succeeds as a pluralistic, multi-vocal mosaic that challenges traditional documentary authority. Its strength lies in its systemic critique of Western institutions and its refusal to present a homogeneous American landscape. However, the film's fragmented, observational style often results in incidental rather than intentional representation. While it captures a diverse urban reality, it lacks deep, agentic character studies for specific marginalized groups. Ultimately, the work is a seminal piece of narrative deconstruction. It replaces a singular authoritative voice with a collection of perspectives that reflect the social volatility of the early 1970s.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.