You are here:

Intervals

Intervals

Representation Score

6.9/10

Good

1973

Not Rated

Director

Peter Greenaway

Runtime

7 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Peter Greenaway’s *Intervals* is an experimental documentary that prioritizes urban textures and movement over character-driven storytelling. By relying on a static camera and anonymous pedestrians, the film avoids many traditional identity-based hierarchies found in narrative cinema. While the work disrupts conventional spectatorship through its formalist approach, it operates primarily through omission. It does not actively promote specific identities, limiting its proactive representation. Ultimately, the film’s value lies in its ability to bypass the social clichés of mid-century cinema by stripping subjects of individual identity and focusing on the collective urban environment.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Intervals have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film does not explicitly depict LGBTQ+ characters or romantic orientations. Its non-narrative structure avoids typical heterosexual assumptions, but it does not provide active representation either.

How does Intervals portray gender?

Fair

By focusing on anonymous pedestrians and urban decay, the film avoids traditional gender roles. The static camera and lack of dialogue disrupt the usual male perspective.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Intervals?

Fair

The focus on constant pedestrian traffic suggests a diverse urban population. However, the film does not visually confirm the racial or ethnic makeup of these passersby.

How does Intervals represent religion and culture?

Good

The work emphasizes sensory experience over traditional moral frameworks. Its focus on urban decay subtly critiques modern capitalist structures.

Does Intervals include disability representation?

Fair

The film avoids common stereotypes about disability, such as tragedy or mockery. However, it does not proactively feature perspectives of neurodivergent or disabled individuals.

Present on Screen

  • Disrupts traditional gender roles by removing character-driven arcs and dialogue.
  • Avoids common disability stereotypes through its observational lens.
  • Challenges conventional narrative expectations and the male perspective via a formalist, non-narrative structure.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks explicit LGBTQ+ representation or character-driven ability to act.
  • Provides no specific visual confirmation of racial or ethnic diversity.
  • Does not proactively feature neurodivergent or disabled perspectives.

Official Synopsis

A short film which has its emphasis on back street walls with peeling posters and the constant pedestrian traffic in the foreground. It has a static camera positioned in front of the walls; experimental editing techniques, no dialogue-just background music, and quick edits of blackness throughout.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.