
Five and Ten
1931

1930
NRDirector
Phil Rosen
Runtime
71 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Alice Kendall is the darling of her social set, the sons and daughters of millionaires, although Alice's mother has impoverished herself to provide Alice with the luxuries she expects as her right. Mom blows what's left of her fortune to provide the best trousseau that money can buy when Alice marries Fred Garlan, and then wishes Fred lots of luck. Now, Alice is trying to coax Fred into buying her a new sable coat while Fred is busily trying to borrow enough money to keep his business afloat.
Overall Score
Minimal
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on a traditional heterosexual marriage. There is no evidence of non-heteronormative identities or narratives that challenge heteronormative structures.
Gender Representation
Alice exerts influence through material demands, while Fred occupies the traditional provider role. The film reinforces conventional gendered expectations of the era rather than subverting them.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The story centers on a specific Western social class. The narrative suggests a homogeneous environment without the inclusion of non-Anglo-Saxon perspectives.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The drama explores class and capitalism through a traditional lens. It focuses on maintaining a specific social set rather than critiquing Western institutions.
Disability Representation
There is no mention of characters with visible or invisible disabilities. Disability does not appear to be used as a narrative device.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Extravagance is a period-typical social melodrama that adheres to the established hierarchies of 1930s cinema. The narrative focuses on the internal friction of a specific socioeconomic class, emphasizing material desire and domestic conflict. The film operates within standard dramatic tropes, prioritizing the preservation of social status. It lacks the structural elements necessary to disrupt social norms or offer intersectional perspectives. Ultimately, the work functions as a study of class tension and economic instability within a very narrow, traditional framework.

1931

1934

1936

1924

1921

1931

1931

1938

1922

1930

1918

1930
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.