New Showbiz

You are here:
A Sixth Part of the World

A Sixth Part of the World

1926

Director

Dziga Vertov

Runtime

75 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Through the travelogue format, it depicts the multitude of Soviet peoples in remote areas of USSR and details the entirety of the wealth of the Soviet land. Focusing on cultural and economic diversity, the film is in fact a call for unification in order to build a "complete socialist society".

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.9/10

Good

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film functions as a documentary essay focused on industrial and geographic breadth. There is no evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or narratives addressing non-heteronormative identities.

Gender Representation

Good

The narrative disrupts traditional domestic hierarchies by repositioning women within industrial and agricultural spheres. It emphasizes their agency as essential components of the collective labor force rather than focusing on domesticity.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Excellent

The film excels in depicting the multi-ethnic composition of Soviet territories. It utilizes a travelogue format to showcase a vast array of ethnic groups and nationalities beyond a homogeneous perspective.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The work prioritizes secularism and state-building over religious institutions. It celebrates collective ownership and the transition from agrarian traditionalism to industrial modernity as a progressive evolution.

Disability Representation

Minimal

The film focuses heavily on the physical capabilities of the proletariat and industrial mechanics. However, there is insufficient evidence to determine the portrayal of individuals with disabilities.

Strengths

  • Exceptional depiction of multi-ethnic identities and diverse nationalities across Soviet territories.
  • Subverts traditional gender roles by centering women as active participants in industrial labor.
  • Strong critique of Western capitalist structures in favor of collective social frameworks.

Areas for Improvement

  • Complete absence of LGBTQ+ representation or non-heteronormative narratives.
  • Lack of visible or meaningful representation regarding individuals with disabilities.
  • Heavy focus on industrial utility may overlook individual identities outside of labor.

AI Analysis

Dziga Vertov’s documentary is a radical exercise in cinematic deconstruction. It succeeds by dismantling Western-centric and capitalist social structures, replacing them with a vision of collective, multi-ethnic agency through the 'Kino-Eye' lens. The film's strength lies in its vast ethnic and cultural scope. By presenting a mosaic of diverse identities unified under a socialist framework, it moves far beyond the homogeneous perspectives common in traditional cinema. However, the work is limited by its narrow focus on industrial progress and state-building. This utilitarian lens results in a total absence of LGBTQ+ narratives and leaves disability representation unaddressed.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.