You are here:
The Eleventh Year

The Eleventh Year

1928

Director

Dziga Vertov

Runtime

52 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

The film is dedicated to the achievements of the Ukrainian SSR for the eleventh anniversary of the October Revolution.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.3/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film contains no depictions of non-heteronormative identities. It focuses strictly on the materialist realities of 1920s Soviet agrarian life.

Gender Representation

Fair

Women are presented as essential components of the collective economic engine rather than domestic subordinates. The film frames gendered roles through their functional contributions to the socialist agricultural cycle.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The cast is demographically homogeneous, consisting primarily of Slavic peasants. It presents a localized ethnic reality without imposing external racial hierarchies.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The narrative celebrates a secular, materialist worldview that prioritizes communal resource management over private ownership. It actively challenges Western notions of individual merit and capitalist accumulation.

Disability Representation

Limited

There is no specific focus on disability. The film emphasizes physical vitality for labor but avoids tropes by focusing on collective functional capacity.

Strengths

  • Provides a profound critique of individualist and capitalist storytelling structures.
  • Frames women as indispensable, active participants in the collective economic engine.
  • Promotes a powerful, secular worldview centered on communal resource management.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks any representation of LGBTQ+ identities or queer narratives.
  • Features a demographically homogeneous cast consisting mostly of Slavic peasants.
  • Does not address or include depictions of individuals with disabilities.

AI Analysis

Dziga Vertov’s documentary rejects individualist storytelling in favor of the 'mass hero.' By centering the narrative on the rhythmic, synchronized labor of the peasantry, the film replaces personal agency with communal utility. While the work lacks diversity in LGBTQ+ and racial categories, it excels in cultural representation. It serves as a systemic rejection of Western values, framing the socialist collective as the primary driver of progress. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its radical cinematic theory, which disrupts conventional narrative expectations to celebrate the reorganization of rural life.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.