New Showbiz

You are here:
The House I Live In

The House I Live In

1957

Director

Lev Kulidzhanov, Yakov Segel

Runtime

95 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

1935. Two families — Davydov's with three children and the newlyweds Lida and Dmitri Kashirin's — enter the new house on the outskirts of Moscow into a common communal apartment. The children grow up, and they and the adults around them are looking for their place in life, looking for answers to the questions of who to be and what to be, quarreling, making peace, building relationships, destroying them. Six years later, the peaceful lives of characters, with their joys and misfortunes, quarrels and reconciliations, and complex personal relationships, are blown up by a war that connects everyone at once, forcing them to see the meaning of their days, their attitudes to each other and their life values in a different way. For some of them, war is a fatal trait.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.8/10

Fair

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks any evidence of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy. The narrative follows the traditional heteronormative structures typical of 1957 Soviet cinema.

Gender Representation

Fair

Women are depicted managing the complexities of communal life and household duties. While gender hierarchies are not explicitly subverted, the communal setting suggests a shift toward shared domestic agency.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The cast reflects the multi-ethnic composition of the Soviet Union. The Moscow setting facilitates ethnic variety, reflecting the era's urban social reality.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The film prioritizes collective living and social responsibility over the private, capitalist family unit. It aligns with state-sanctioned secularism by omitting religious institutions.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no documented evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities within the film.

Strengths

  • Challenges Western individualism by centering the narrative on communal living and shared social responsibility.
  • Provides a nuanced look at gendered labor and domestic agency within a shared living environment.
  • Reflects the multi-ethnic reality of the urban Soviet population through its setting and cast.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative gender expressions.
  • Provides no visible depiction of physical or neurodivergent disabilities.
  • Does not explicitly subvert systemic gender hierarchies within the domestic sphere.

AI Analysis

The film serves as a profound study of collective identity, centering on the friction and connection found within a Moscow communal apartment. It successfully deconstructs the Western concept of the isolated nuclear family, replacing it with a complex social structure where identity is tied to the group. While the work lacks contemporary markers of LGBTQ+ or disability representation, it offers a unique cultural perspective. The narrative emphasizes systemic connection and shared struggle, particularly as the onset of war forces characters to re-evaluate their values and relationships. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its ideological framing of the communal experience over individualist pursuits, providing a window into the social realities of the mid-20th century Soviet era.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.