New Showbiz

You are here:
The New Devil of Hellsbottom

The New Devil of Hellsbottom

1965

Director

Jüri Müür, Grigori Kromanov

Runtime

94 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

The way Saint Peter explains it to the Devil who's knocking on Heaven's door to collect his share of souls: there will be no more souls, as God has come to doubt if humans are really meant to achieve salvation. If they aren't then how can they be punished posthumous and sent to Hell? There's only one way to make sure if sinning is the human nature, or is it that they simply don't want to better themselves - Devil himself must go down to Earth, in human form, and if he can achieve salvation then so can a human being... Based on A. H. Tammsaare's classic novel of the same name.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.7/10

Fair

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film lacks explicit LGBTQ+ characters or non-heteronormative narratives. It focuses on a theological conflict that adheres to the conventional gender roles of 1965.

Gender Representation

Fair

The narrative centers on masculine archetypes of authority and temptation through Saint Peter and the Devil. There is no evidence of female agency driving the plot.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

Reflecting the demographic reality of the Estonian SSR, the film is culturally and ethnically homogeneous. It prioritizes universal theological themes over racial or ethnic intersectionality.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film excels by challenging religious certainties and promoting moral relativism. It uses the Devil's journey to deconstruct dogmatic truths and explore the complexity of human nature.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no mention of characters with visible or invisible disabilities. No evidence of such representation exists within the narrative.

Strengths

  • Strong subversion of traditional religious certainties and dogmatic truths.
  • Engaging exploration of moral relativism and the complexity of human nature.
  • Intellectual depth through the deconstruction of divine morality.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of intersectional demographic breadth regarding gender and identity.
  • Absence of racial or ethnic diversity within the narrative.
  • Minimal representation of LGBTQ+ characters or non-heteronormative themes.

AI Analysis

The film is a philosophical comedy that prioritizes existential inquiry over demographic breadth. It succeeds in subverting religious dogma by questioning the mechanics of salvation and sin through a skeptical lens. However, the production is limited by its historical and regional context. It lacks intersectional representation, focusing instead on a homogeneous cast and traditional masculine archetypes. Ultimately, while the film offers deep intellectual engagement with moral ambiguity, it remains narrow in its social and identity-based diversity.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.