You are here:
How to Be Really Bad

How to Be Really Bad

2018

Director

Marco Petry

Runtime

100 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

The life of 14-year-old Lilith is similar to that of a normal teenager, but there is a peculiarity: she is the daughter of the devil and lives with him in hell. Because she is totally bored there and also wants to have fun and explore the world, she makes a pact with her father: she is allowed to go to earth for a week - but she has to convert a good person to evil there. If she succeeds in this challenge, she may stay on earth forever, otherwise she'll be waving a hell of a boring job in the bookkeeping of the underworld.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.8/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film lacks explicit evidence of LGBTQ+ identities or non-heteronormative relationship dynamics. Representation is not a primary driver of this supernatural coming-of-age story.

Gender Representation

Fair

Lilith serves as a proactive protagonist with significant agency. Her mission to manipulate human morality subverts traditional passive female roles in favor of active leadership.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The narrative prioritizes a metaphysical conflict over ethnic exploration. There is no evidence of diverse ensemble dynamics or intentional racial representation within the human world.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The film disrupts Western moral frameworks by framing the daughter of the devil as a relatable teenager. It uses moral relativism to deconstruct traditional concepts of goodness.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no evidence of physical or neurodivergent disabilities being depicted or included in the narrative.

Strengths

  • Subverts traditional female roles by giving Lilith significant agency and leadership.
  • Challenges conventional moral hierarchies through a postmodern lens of moral relativism.
  • Deconstructs the binary of good versus evil through a unique mythological framework.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-heteronormative dynamics.
  • Provides no evidence of racial or ethnic diversity within the ensemble.
  • Does not include depictions of physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

AI Analysis

The film's narrative architecture excels at deconstructing traditional moral hierarchies. By centering on a character who views goodness as a hurdle, it employs a postmodern approach to ethics and institutional values. However, the work lacks explicit intersectional markers. The focus remains heavily on a mythological framework, leaving gaps in racial, ethnic, and LGBTQ+ representation. Ultimately, while the film challenges established ethical systems, it does not provide a diverse social landscape or specific representation of marginalized identities.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.