You are here:
October in Madrid

October in Madrid

1965

Director

Marcel Hanoun

Runtime

62 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Initially a made-to-order documentary on Spain, the film becomes an open-ended work-in-the-making about the creative process. “Settling in the Spanish capital to make a documentary, Hanoun sketches out for us the different steps involved in making a film. The author turns his hesitations, his doubts and difficult working conditions into the constituents of his work”. (Raphaël Bassan)

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.8/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks documented evidence of specific LGBTQ+ character arcs or non-cisnormative identities. It focuses on the mechanics of filmmaking rather than social identity narratives.

Gender Representation

Fair

The film departs from the authoritative 'voice of God' style that often reinforces patriarchal structures. However, it lacks explicit gendered character dynamics or the subversion of gender hierarchies.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

Set in Madrid, the film engages with the local Spanish population. It avoids colonialist ethnographic tropes by prioritizing local reality over curated, stereotypical depictions of the 'other.'

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The work disrupts conventional documentary expectations by embracing a fragmented, postmodern reality. It critiques the mission to present a polished, singular truth through intellectual skepticism.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no verifiable evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities within the film.

Strengths

  • Subverts traditional, authoritative documentary structures in favor of a subjective perspective.
  • Avoids colonialist ethnographic tropes by focusing on local Spanish reality.
  • Challenges the concept of a singular, polished truth through a reflexive filmmaking process.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities or character arcs.
  • Provides no verifiable evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities.
  • Does not feature explicit gender-based narrative architecture or subversion of hierarchies.

AI Analysis

Marcel Hanoun’s documentary is a meta-cinematic exploration that prioritizes the creative process over traditional narrative. It succeeds by subverting the monolithic, authoritative structures common in mid-20th-century media, favoring a subjective and reflexive approach. While the film achieves progress through formal experimentation, it lacks explicit identity-based representation. There is no evidence of LGBTQ+ or disability-focused narratives, leaving these categories unaddressed. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its intellectual skepticism. By turning working difficulties into the core of the work, it challenges the stability of Western institutional storytelling.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.