
The Herdsman
1982

1990
PG-13Director
James F. Collier
Runtime
101 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Young Sung Neng Yee, who is brought as part of a wealthy Chinese family. She is eager to become part of Mao Tze Tung's "new society", but soon becomes disenchanted by the economic misery the changes bring to her family. Before long, the authorities become aware of Neng Yee's feelings and she is taken to a labour camp, overseen by the sadistic Colonel Cheng.
Overall Score
Good
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film contains no LGBTQ+ characters or explorations of non-heteronormative identities. The story focuses exclusively on familial and survivalist dynamics.
Gender Representation
The female lead demonstrates cognitive autonomy as she evolves from a societal participant to a disillusioned critic. However, the narrative remains largely confined to domestic and familial spheres.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film centers a Chinese cultural context with a predominantly non-Western cast. It avoids the 'outsider looking in' trope by granting significant agency to characters of color.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative offers a sophisticated critique of Maoist-era society through the lens of systemic failure. It portrays state authorities as oppressive forces rather than utopian ideals.
Disability Representation
There is no discernible representation of physical or neurodivergent disabilities within the film.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
China Cry succeeds as a historical drama by centering the lived experiences of a Chinese family navigating radical political shifts. It avoids common Western pitfalls by allowing its characters of color to drive the emotional and political stakes of the story. The film's strength lies in its nuanced critique of institutional power and its refusal to present a utopian view of ideological change. By focusing on the human cost of economic misery and authoritarianism, it provides a complex view of cultural transformation. However, the film lacks diversity in terms of LGBTQ+ and disability representation. While the female lead possesses intellectual agency, the narrative's focus on domestic spheres limits its exploration of broader gendered spaces.

1982

1994

1982

2010

1991

2005

1955

1990

2014

1994

1988

1991
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.