You are here:

Best of the Badmen

Best of the Badmen

Representation Score

0.6/10

Minimal

1951

NR

Director

William D. Russell

Runtime

84 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Best of the Badmen is a quintessential mid-century Western that follows the established cinematic grammar of its time. The story centers on traditional archetypes and narrative structures, focusing on the internal political tensions of the post-Civil War West through a homogeneous lens. The film upholds the social and demographic norms of the 1950s without challenging them. While it critiques specific corrupt lawmen, it does not extend this critique to broader systemic issues. Ultimately, the work serves as a baseline for genre conventions, prioritizing masculine conflict and a narrow racial perspective.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Best of the Badmen have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film operates within a framework that assumes everyone is straight and cisgender. There is no representation of LGBTQ+ identities or same-sex relationships.

How does Best of the Badmen portray gender?

Limited

The narrative focuses on masculine competition and outlawry, with women having limited roles that reinforce traditional gender hierarchies.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Best of the Badmen?

Limited

The production features a predominantly white, Anglo-Saxon cast. It does not include a diverse range of ethnicities or utilize actors from different backgrounds.

How does Best of the Badmen represent religion and culture?

Limited

The film explores personal honor against institutional corruption but does not critically examine religious or capitalist systems. The morality presented is relatively straightforward.

Does Best of the Badmen include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no representation of physical, sensory, or neurodivergent identities. Characters are defined solely by their roles as soldiers or outlaws.

Present on Screen

  • Explores themes of individual integrity against corrupt authority.
  • Provides a clear study of mid-century Western genre archetypes.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks representation of diverse racial, gender, or neurodivergent identities.
  • Does not challenge systemic hierarchies or provide a multicultural perspective.
  • Maintains a strictly male-centric narrative structure.

Official Synopsis

After the North defeats the South, Union Maj. Jeff Clanton heads to Missouri to provide the Confederacy's Quantrill's Raiders a chance to claim allegiance to the Union, thereby clearing their wanted status. But standing in Clanton's way are the corrupt lawmen Joad and Fowler, who would rather keep the men outlaws to collect the reward on their heads. After Joad and Fowler frame Clanton for murder, he manages to escape, becoming an outlaw himself.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.