Ex-Lady
1933
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.8 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
Let's Make a Dream
1936
Not RatedDirector
Sacha Guitry
Runtime
86 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
A husband who has just cheated on his wife returns home in the early morning, puzzled. He finds there, without knowing it, the lover of his wife, to whom he confesses his infidelity.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
4.6/10
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The narrative focuses exclusively on heterosexual infidelity. There is no evidence of queer identities or non-heteronormative storylines within the plot.
Gender Representation
The film subverts traditional roles by centering on the agency of both the husband and wife. It challenges the trope of the virtuous domestic wife through parallel infidelity.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
Reflecting the 1936 French cinematic context, the film appears to adhere to the homogeneous demographic norms of the era. No diverse casting is indicated.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story uses moral relativism to treat infidelity as a comedic catalyst. It deconstructs the sanctity of the traditional Western family unit through situational ethics.
Disability Representation
The synopsis provides no information regarding characters with visible or invisible disabilities.
Strengths
- Challenges traditional gendered hierarchies by prioritizing individual romantic agency.
- Uses wit to deconstruct the rigid social mores of the bourgeois domestic unit.
- Employs moral relativism to explore complex human desires and social contracts.
Areas for Improvement
- Lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or queer narratives.
- Reflects the racial homogeneity typical of early 20th-century European cinema.
- Provides no visibility for characters with disabilities.
AI Analysis
Sacha Guitry’s comedy functions as a period-specific critique of bourgeois domesticity. By framing marriage as a site of situational morality rather than absolute stability, the film offers a sophisticated look at romantic autonomy. However, the work remains limited by the social standards of 1936. It lacks intersectional breadth, offering little to no representation for LGBTQ+ individuals or diverse racial groups, reflecting the era's homogeneous social structures. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its narrative willingness to deconstruct traditional institutions, even if it fails to meet modern standards for demographic diversity.
Similar Movies
Rue de l'Estrapade
1953
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.1 out of 10
The Seducer
1954
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.3 out of 10
Kiss and Make-Up
1934
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.9 out of 10
One Hour with You
1932
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.1 out of 10
Unfaithfully Yours
1948
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.7 out of 10
The Love Parade
1929
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.6 out of 10
Private Lives
1931
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.3 out of 10
The Marriage Circle
1924
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.1 out of 10
Classified
1925
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.1 out of 10
A Knight in London
1928
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.2 out of 10
The Magnificent Cuckold
1964
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.3 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.