You are here:

Mountain of Wrath

Name: Mountain of Wrath
Director: Ljubiša Georgievski
Released: 1968
Duration: 83 min

No Poster Available

Representation Score

4.5/10

Fair

1968

Director

Ljubiša Georgievski

Runtime

83 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Mountain of Wrath is a socio-political drama centered on the tension between traditional agrarian life and socialist restructuring in 1940s Macedonia. It functions as a study of ideological shifts, prioritizing the collective over the individual. The film excels in its cultural critique of capitalism and private property. However, it lacks diversity in gendered ability to act and LGBTQ+ visibility, remaining rooted in the masculine archetypes of the era. Ultimately, the work is a localized exploration of national identity and class struggle, offering significant depth in its socio-political themes while remaining narrow in its demographic representation.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Mountain of Wrath have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any visible LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. The story centers on class struggle and agrarian reform within a traditional social framework.

How does Mountain of Wrath portray gender?

Fair

The story focuses on male-dominated revolutionary structures. The protagonist, Stamat, embodies traditional masculine archetypes of the fighter and the political idealist.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Mountain of Wrath?

Fair

The setting in a Macedonian village suggests an ethnically homogeneous cast. Identity is explored through political affiliation and regional transition rather than racial diversity.

How does Mountain of Wrath represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The narrative strongly critiques Western capitalist structures. It prioritizes collective social organization and anti-capitalist ideals over individualist economic models.

Does Mountain of Wrath include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no evidence of characters with physical or neurodivergent disabilities in the narrative.

Present on Screen

Strong critique of individualist capitalist models.
Deep engagement with collective social organization and communal progress.
Authentic exploration of regional identity and socio-political transition.

Limited or Absent

Lack of gender diversity in leadership and primary roles.
Absence of LGBTQ+ representation or non-straight narratives.
Minimal focus on disability or neurodivergent perspectives.

Official Synopsis

After the liberation in 1946, in a village in western Macedonia implemented collectivization farms. The President of the rural cooperative Stamat, former fighter, who with all their revolutionary zeal and enthusiasm believes collectivization only way for poor farmers. In doing so, he faces resistance from wealthy farmers who can hardly be separated from the property. In contrast, Stamat faced with the decision of the Committee, the mountain that provides a livelihood and that villagers consider her to be assigned to the Wood Industry. His attempt to change this decision, there is no success. He feels that his revolutionary ideal betrayed. In these circumstances Stamat faced with the fact that the villagers do not trust him, but nevertheless he stands on the right side.

How are these scores produced? →