You are here:

Finger on the Trigger

Finger on the Trigger

Representation Score

0.6/10

Minimal

1965

Director

Sidney W. Pink

Runtime

94 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Finger on the Trigger is a quintessential mid-century B-Western that upholds established social hierarchies. The story relies on traditional masculine and racial conflict clichés typical of the era's genre productions. The film prioritizes conventional storytelling over deeper representation. It reflects the standard view of the American West and its power dynamics of the 1960s. Ultimately, the work lacks intentionality regarding diverse representation, favoring a traditional perspective.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Finger on the Trigger have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film follows the conventions of 1960s frontier cinema, which assumes everyone is straight and cisgender. There are no representations of non-traditional gender identities or same-sex relationships.

How does Finger on the Trigger portray gender?

Limited

The story focuses on male characters taking a leading role, using traditional gender stereotypes. Female characters mainly motivate the male protagonist’s journey.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Finger on the Trigger?

Limited

The cast is predominantly white, reflecting the demographics of the mid-1960s. Indigenous characters are portrayed through standard conflict clichés rather than nuanced representation.

How does Finger on the Trigger represent religion and culture?

Limited

The film emphasizes frontier survival and individualistic justice within a traditional Western setting. It centers on the classic mythos of the lawless frontier.

Does Finger on the Trigger include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no focus on neurodivergence, physical disabilities, or mental health conditions. Characters are defined by the physical demands of frontier survival.

Present on Screen

  • The film provides a clear example of the mid-century B-Western genre and its traditional narrative structures.

Limited or Absent

  • The film lacks nuanced representation for Indigenous characters, relying on standard conflict clichés.
  • Gender dynamics are limited, with female characters serving primarily as secondary motivators for male protagonists.
  • The narrative lacks depth, reinforcing traditional social and cultural hierarchies of the 1960s.

Official Synopsis

At the end of the Civil War, a ragtag group of just-discharged Union soldiers clashes with a band of renegade Confederates over a golden treasure hidden in a deserted town in the Oklahoma Territory. Soon these rivals must make common cause in the face of an Indian attack.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.