You are here:

Love and Anger

Love and Anger

Representation Score

8.9/10

Excellent

1969

Director

Jean-Luc Godard, Marco Bellocchio, Pier Paolo Pasolini, Bernardo Bertolucci, Carlo Lizzani

Runtime

102 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

This anthology film employs a fragmented structure to critique systemic power and social isolation. By featuring renowned directors such as Pasolini and Godard, the film challenges cultural and traditional humanist values. Its strength lies in its intellectual construction, which questions the status quo and Western institutional authority. It views traditional structures like family and capitalism as sources of human alienation. While it lacks modern multi-layered casting, it remains dedicated to dismantling mid-20th-century hierarchies through its thematic focus on revolution and social decline.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Love and Anger have LGBTQ+ representation?

Good

The inclusion of Pier Paolo Pasolini brings a challenge to traditional heterosexual norms by focusing on connections outside conventional domestic life and the breaking of social taboos.

How does Love and Anger portray gender?

Good

The film criticizes traditional gender roles by highlighting systemic violence and vulnerability, particularly through a scene depicting a woman's assault, which underscores societal indifference towards women.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Love and Anger?

Fair

The film shifts between New York and Cuba to critique Western dominance, but non-Western identities are more represented as political themes than through a diverse cast of characters.

How does Love and Anger represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film effectively questions Western institutions and traditional morality through social unrest, challenging established authority and social order.

Does Love and Anger include disability representation?

Fair

Depictions of homeless individuals and those in extreme pain highlight physical and psychological suffering, often used as a philosophical tool rather than exploring disability as a lived experience.

Present on Screen

  • Sophisticated subversion of cultural and social norms through high director pedigree.
  • Strong critique of Western institutional stability and capitalist indifference.
  • Effective use of global settings to challenge Eurocentric perspectives.

Limited or Absent

  • Non-Western identities are more represented as political themes than as diverse characters.
  • Disability is often used as a stylistic device rather than a lived experience.
  • Lacks the multi-layered casting found in contemporary cinema.

Official Synopsis

Five short stories with contemporary settings. In New York, people are indifferent to derelicts sleeping on sidewalks, to a woman's assault in front of an apartment building, and to a couple injured in a car crash. A man, stripped of his identity, dies in bed with actors expressing his agony. A cheerful, innocent young man walking a city street in a time of war pays a price for this innocence. A couple talks about cinema while it watches another couple talk of love and truth on the eve of one character's return to Cuba. Striking students take over a university classroom; an argument follows about revolution or incremental change.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.