You are here:

Jonah Who Will Be 25 in the Year 2000

Jonah Who Will Be 25 in the Year 2000

Representation Score

7.0/10

Good

1976

Director

Alain Tanner

Runtime

116 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Alain Tanner’s film is a deep intellectual challenge to the social norms of the mid-20th century. It breaks down the stability of Western capitalism through a fragmented, episodic structure that favors flexible, decentralized ways of life. While the film doesn’t highlight racial or LGBTQ+ diversity, it does well in depicting gender dynamics and critiquing consumerism. The characters’ rejection of conventional stability is a key theme. Overall, the film explores individual alienation within a rigid social structure, focusing more on existential questions than traditional storytelling.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Jonah Who Will Be 25 in the Year 2000 have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film doesn't focus much on non-binary or same-sex relationships. It focuses more on a general sense of unease rather than specific LGBTQ+ issues.

How does Jonah Who Will Be 25 in the Year 2000 portray gender?

Good

Women like Myriam and Marie have significant independence, choosing unconventional lifestyles or resisting consumer culture. The film avoids typical gender clichés, emphasizing women's autonomy over traditional roles.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Jonah Who Will Be 25 in the Year 2000?

Limited

The cast is mostly white and European, focusing on a 1970s Swiss context. There isn't much diversity in terms of race or ethnicity.

How does Jonah Who Will Be 25 in the Year 2000 represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film provides a detailed look at Western capitalism and its institutions, showing how communal living can be a response to an oppressive system.

Does Jonah Who Will Be 25 in the Year 2000 include disability representation?

Fair

There are no prominent portrayals of physical or mental disabilities. Characters face psychological isolation, but there is no direct focus on disabilities.

Present on Screen

  • Provides a strong critique of Western institutions and consumerist alienation.
  • Offers nuanced gender representation with significant female autonomy.
  • Shows communal living as a rejection of conventional stability.

Limited or Absent

  • Needs more diverse racial and ethnic representation.
  • Could benefit from more explicit LGBTQ+ identities.
  • Should include more representations of physical and mental disabilities.

Official Synopsis

A look at the lives of several men and women in their 30s as they confront the slim gains of the "revolutionary" sixties. Max, a dissatisfied copy editor; Myriam, a redhead into tantric sex; and Marie, a supermarket checker who gives unauthorized discounts to the elderly, search for renewed meaning on a communal farm. The title character, a six-year-old child, is the carrier of their hopes for the future.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.