New Showbiz

You are here:
Jonah Who Will Be 25 in the Year 2000

Jonah Who Will Be 25 in the Year 2000

1976

Director

Alain Tanner

Runtime

116 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A look at the lives of several men and women in their 30s as they confront the slim gains of the "revolutionary" sixties. Max, a dissatisfied copy editor; Myriam, a redhead into tantric sex; and Marie, a supermarket checker who gives unauthorized discounts to the elderly, search for renewed meaning on a communal farm. The title character, a six-year-old child, is the carrier of their hopes for the future.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.0/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film lacks explicit focus on non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy. The narrative prioritizes existential malaise over specific queer identity politics or semiotic markers.

Gender Representation

Good

Women like Myriam and Marie possess significant autonomy, pursuing unconventional lifestyles or defying consumerist structures. The film avoids traditional tropes, prioritizing female subjectivity over patriarchal utility.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The cast is primarily white and European, reflecting a localized study of 1970s Swiss society. This lack of racial intersectionality results in a lower score for diversity.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The film offers a sophisticated critique of Western capitalism and institutional frameworks. It frames communal living and 'unproductivity' as legitimate responses to an oppressive, alienating social system.

Disability Representation

Fair

There is no prominent depiction of physical or neurodivergent disabilities. While characters experience psychological alienation, there is no explicit evidence of disability-driven agency.

Strengths

  • Strong critique of Western institutional frameworks and consumerist alienation.
  • Nuanced gender representation that grants women significant autonomy and agency.
  • Sophisticated portrayal of communal living as a rejection of bourgeois stability.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of racial intersectionality or non-white presence in the cast.
  • Absence of explicit LGBTQ+ identities or same-sex intimacy.
  • Minimal representation of physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

AI Analysis

Alain Tanner’s film is a profound intellectual subversion of the mid-century social contract. It excels at dismantling Western capitalist stability through a postmodern, episodic structure that favors fluid, decentralized ways of living. While the film lacks racial and LGBTQ+ visibility, it compensates with a nuanced approach to gender dynamics and a powerful critique of consumerist alienation. The characters' rejection of bourgeois stability serves as a central thematic pillar. Ultimately, the work functions as a study of individual alienation within a rigid social system, prioritizing existential inquiry over traditional narrative satisfaction.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Movie poster for Charles, Dead or Alive

Charles, Dead or Alive

1970

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.5 out of 10

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.