
Twice a Judas
1968

1964
Director
Mario Bava
Runtime
79 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
A lone rider comes across a dying soldier, the victim of an Indian attack, who gives him a paper authorizing the payment of $150,000 to the U.S. Army. The rider gathers some colleagues who disguise themselves as soldiers and who take the paper to a bank. They get the money but a shoot-out occurs, an old woman is killed, and the gang acrimoniously splits up. Later some members of the gang meet up with some real U.S. Cavalry soldiers and together they must fight off new Indian attacks.
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks any evidence of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy. It adheres strictly to the traditional masculine archetypes typical of the 1964 Western genre.
Gender Representation
The story centers on a male-dominated ensemble of riders and soldiers. A single female character is killed during a shootout, serving primarily as a plot device rather than a person with agency.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
Indigenous populations are present but function largely as externalized threats within a standard 'Indian attack' trope. The narrative reinforces conventional frontier dichotomies rather than offering nuanced character depth.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The plot operates within the framework of Western expansionism and military structures. It focuses on the pursuit of capital and frontier lawlessness without offering institutional critique.
Disability Representation
There is no information available regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities in this film.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Mario Bava's Western follows the established cinematic norms of the mid-1960s, prioritizing genre tropes like frontier survival and the pursuit of wealth. The narrative structure relies on traditional archetypes that favor masculine-driven conflict and standard racial dichotomies. The film lacks intersectional depth, treating non-white characters as obstacles and female characters as catalysts for plot shifts rather than fully realized individuals. It functions as a standard genre piece rather than a subversion of social hierarchies.

1968

1966

1970

1968

1956

1963

1971

1960

1953

1971

1970

1952
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.