
The Brasher Doubloon
1947

1939
NRDirector
John Farrow
Runtime
64 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Suave private detective Simon "The Saint" Templar arrives in San Francisco and meets Val, a woman whose police inspector father killed himself after being accused of corruption and dismissed from the force. Convinced of the man's innocence, Templar takes it upon himself to vindicate the memory of Val's father. To do so he must take on the city's most dangerous criminal gang, while also battling hostile members of the police department.
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks any evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or non-heteronormative identities. The story follows a conventional heteronormative framework typical of 1930s crime cinema.
Gender Representation
Simon Templar serves as the primary agent of justice, centering male agency. While Val drives the plot through her father's death, she functions more as a catalyst than an independent actor.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative does not indicate a diverse cast or the inclusion of non-Anglo-Saxon characters in positions of agency. It appears to adhere to the homogeneous casting standards of the era.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film critiques institutional corruption within a police department. However, this is framed as a quest for individual vindication rather than a systemic deconstruction of social institutions.
Disability Representation
There is no documented evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities in this production.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
The film is a standard genre piece that reflects the social and cinematic norms of 1939. It relies on traditional hierarchies, placing the burden of action and investigation on a male protagonist. While the plot explores themes of corruption and justice, these elements are handled through a conventional mystery lens. The narrative focuses on individual heroism rather than challenging systemic power structures or providing diverse perspectives. Ultimately, the production lacks significant representation across most identity categories, adhering to the era's typical focus on a homogeneous, heteronormative cast.

1947

1938

1953

1931

1933

1937

1951

1953

1936

1931

1947

1940
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.