You are here:

Perekop

Name: Perekop
Director: Ivan Kavaleridze
Released: 1930
Duration: 50 min

Representation Score

3.6/10

Limited

1930

Director

Ivan Kavaleridze

Runtime

50 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Perekop is a cinematic exploration of the Russian Civil War that uses the defense of Perekop as a metaphor for industrialization. It deconstructs traditional power structures, specifically targeting monarchical and religious institutions. However, the film lacks modern multi-layered markers. It provides no representation for LGBTQ+ individuals or people with disabilities, focusing instead on the physical demands of revolution. While it captures a multi-ethnic proletariat, the characterization is rooted in class struggle rather than individual identity. It is a work of revolutionary romanticism that prioritizes the collective over the individual.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Perekop have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film focuses entirely on class struggle and military mobilization. There is no mention of LGBTQ+ identities or narratives addressing sexual orientation.

How does Perekop portray gender?

Fair

Women are portrayed within the context of the proletariat struggle rather than domestic roles. However, the film does not challenge traditional gender hierarchies or provide significant character's ability to drive the story.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Perekop?

Fair

The narrative features the Ukrainian peasantry and the multi-ethnic Red Army. Representation is driven primarily by class identity rather than specific ethnic backgrounds.

How does Perekop represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film offers a sophisticated critique of the Tsarist order, portraying the Orthodox Church and aristocracy as obstacles to progress. It emphasizes secularism and the collective.

Does Perekop include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no evidence of characters with disabilities being given ability to act. The focus remains strictly on the physical demands of combat and industrial labor.

Present on Screen

Strong deconstruction of traditional Western and monarchical institutions.
Effective portrayal of a multi-ethnic Soviet proletariat and Ukrainian peasantry.
Sophisticated critique of religious and aristocratic systemic obstacles.

Limited or Absent

Complete absence of LGBTQ+ representation or narratives addressing sexual orientation.
Lack of ability to act or nuanced portrayal for characters with disabilities.
Gender roles remain tied to functional revolutionary and military hierarchies.

Official Synopsis

This revolutionary epic likens the push for industrialization of Soviet Ukraine with the battle for Perekop during the Civil War. A missing plow blade is presented as a symbol of the country's backward peasant economy that needs to be transformed in the course of the industrial construction. In an onslaught of rapidly changing images, Ukrainian village with its peasants suspicious of everything new, dramatically collides with the frenzy of working factories, plants, and mines.

How are these scores produced? →