You are here:

Tell Me Lies

Name: Tell Me Lies
Director: Peter Brook
Released: 1968
Duration: 118 min

Representation Score

4.9/10

Fair

1968

Director

Peter Brook

Runtime

118 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Tell Me Lies is a cinematic social commentary that finds its strength in structural defiance rather than demographic variety. It functions as an agitprop drama-doc that blends newsreel footage with satirical skits to challenge political truths. While the film lacks significant racial and LGBTQ+ representation, it offers a sophisticated deconstruction of mid-century political norms. Its progressive value lies in its commitment to challenging the status quo and institutional authority. Ultimately, the work is a study of political friction and the collision of art and protest, prioritizing systemic critique over character-driven identity.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Tell Me Lies have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film emphasizes political protest and performance rather than exploring non-traditional gender identities. There are no explicit LGBTQ+ character arcs or depictions of same-sex relationships.

How does Tell Me Lies portray gender?

Fair

Prominent female figures such as Glenda Jackson and Peggy Ashcroft play key roles in the artistic movement. Women are given significant intellectual and performative roles amid political turmoil.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Tell Me Lies?

Limited

The setting focuses on the London artistic and intellectual community of the late 1960s. The cast reflects the predominantly Anglo-Saxon demographic of the UK's theatrical elite during this period.

How does Tell Me Lies represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film excels in critiquing established power structures and Western geopolitical dominance. It uses an agitprop framework to examine state and military institutions through art and protest.

Does Tell Me Lies include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no verifiable evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities. The film focuses on psychological tensions rather than disability representation.

Present on Screen

Robust critique of Western geopolitical hegemony and institutional authority.
Strong presence of female intellectuals and performers in key roles.
Innovative use of agitprop techniques to challenge traditional narrative structures.

Limited or Absent

Lack of explicit LGBTQ+ character arcs or same-sex intimacy.
Minimal racial diversity within the primary cast and setting.
Absence of representation regarding physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

Official Synopsis

Adapted and directed by Peter Brook from the Royal Shakespeare Company’s ‘production-in-progress US’, this long-unseen agitprop drama-doc – shot in London in 1967 and released only briefly in the UK and New York at the height of the Vietnam War – remains both thought-provoking and disturbing. A theatrical and cinematic social comment on US intervention in Vietnam, Brook’s film also reveals a 1960s London where art, theatre and political protest actively collude and where a young Glenda Jackson and RSC icons such as Peggy Ashcroft and Paul Scofield feature prominently on the front line. Multi-layered scenarios staged by Brook combine with newsreel footage, demonstrations, satirical songs and skits to illustrate the intensity of anti-war opinion within London’s artistic and intellectual community.

How are these scores produced? →