
Rosa la rose, fille publique
1986

1976
Director
Daniel Schmid
Runtime
101 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Beautiful, detached, laconic, consumptive Lily Brest is a streetwalker with few clients. She loves her idle boyfriend Raoul who gambles away what little she earns. The town's power broker, called the rich Jew, discovers she is a good listener, so she's soon busy. Raoul imagines grotesque sex scenes between Lily and the Jew; he leaves her for a man. Her parents, a bitter Fascist who is a cabaret singer in drag and her wheelchair-bound mother, offer no refuge. Even though all have a philosophical bent, the other whores reject Lily because she tolerates everyone, including men. She tires of her lonely life and looks for a way out. Even that act serves the local corrupt powers.
Overall Score
Good
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film subverts patriarchal norms through Lily’s father, a cabaret singer who performs in drag. This gender-nonconforming presence challenges standard domestic tropes of the era.
Gender Representation
Lily’s journey centers on female endurance amidst systemic pressures. The narrative shifts focus away from traditional masculine stability by depicting her boyfriend leaving her for a man.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
A Jewish power broker serves as a central figure of influence. While the cast lacks modern multi-ethnic breadth, this character disrupts monolithic European social hierarchies.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story critiques established institutions by portraying family and local authority as corrupt. It prioritizes a subjective, non-traditional morality over conventional religious or social ideals.
Disability Representation
A wheelchair-bound mother is integrated into the bleak domestic landscape. Her presence avoids heroic tropes, offering a realistic depiction of disability within a dysfunctional family.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Shadow of Angels excels in its philosophical deconstruction of traditional social structures. By centering on a marginalized streetwalker and presenting a gender-nonconforming father, the film avoids easy moralizing and conventional domesticity. However, the film's racial diversity is limited to specific historical archetypes rather than a broad multi-ethnic cast. The representation of disability, while realistic, remains tied to a landscape of familial dysfunction rather than individual agency. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its refusal to provide redemptive endings, opting instead for a systemic critique of power and social outcasts.

1986

1992

1970

2016

1992

1969

1956

2016

1972

1992

1987

1981
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.