New Showbiz

You are here:
The Zoo

The Zoo

1961

Director

Bert Haanstra

Runtime

10 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A perfect, fast and hilarious montage. Using images from Artis (Amsterdam Zoo), Bert Haanstra shows that a couple of similarities can be discovered between human and animal. Particularly the manner in which human and ape are confronted with each other, is significant. The images speak for themselves, human voices or commentary is absent. The ironic music of Pim Jacobs does add an extra dimension to the whole. With regards to human and animal Haanstra limits himself for the time being to this short film, recorded with a hidden camera. Later on, in several big films, he would return to this subject.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

1.0/10

Minimal

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film is a non-narrative observational documentary focusing exclusively on animal subjects. Because there are no human characters or dialogue, there is no depiction of sexual orientation.

Gender Representation

Minimal

The documentary lacks human cast members and narrative character arcs. There is no opportunity for the depiction of gendered social roles or the subversion of gender hierarchies.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The film focuses entirely on the naturalistic movement of animals. It functions as a rhythmic study of movement rather than a vehicle for racial or ethnic allegory.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The film avoids promoting singular moralities by omitting human commentary. However, the zoo setting remains a traditional Western institution.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There are no human subjects depicted in this work. Consequently, no representation of physical or neurodivergent disabilities is present.

Strengths

  • The film avoids the promotion of singular moralities or religious dogmas by omitting human commentary.
  • The ironic musical score and observational style subtly shift focus away from human dominance.
  • The rhythmic montage deconstructs traditional anthropocentric hierarchies by finding parallels between species.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks human characters, preventing any depiction of gender, race, or sexual orientation.
  • The setting of a zoo remains a traditional Western institution without explicit critique.
  • The absence of human narrative means there is no representation of physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

AI Analysis

Bert Haanstra’s *Zoo* is a formalist exercise in cinematic rhythm rather than a study of human social dynamics. By utilizing a hidden camera and omitting dialogue, the film focuses on the rhythmic similarities between humans and animals through montage. Because the film eschews human narrative and characterization in favor of animal behavior, it exists outside the traditional frameworks of identity politics. It does not actively promote traditional hierarchies, but it lacks the character-driven agency required for intersectional representation. The work's significance lies in its semiotic use of movement to find commonalities between species, rather than in the depiction of human social structures.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.