Wild
2018
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.7 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
Wild Wings
1966
Director
Patrick Carey, John Taylor
Runtime
34 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Exploration of the Slimbridge Wild Fowl Trust in Gloucestershire, England, which boasts the largest collection of living wild fowl in the world.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
0.5/10
Minimal
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses entirely on ornithological study. It contains no depictions of human romantic or gender identities.
Gender Representation
As an educational study of wildlife, the documentary lacks human characters. There are no figures present to demonstrate agency or gendered social roles.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative is localized to an ecological site in Gloucestershire. It does not engage with human racial, ethnic, or post-colonial dynamics.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film adheres to 1960s Western scientific and conservationist paradigms. It prioritizes established educational observation over the critique of Western institutions.
Disability Representation
There is no evidence of human subjects with visible or invisible disabilities. The narrative structure does not include human characters.
Strengths
- Provides a focused, observational look at the Slimbridge Wild Fowl Trust's avian collection.
Areas for Improvement
- Lacks human representation, making it impossible to evaluate social, racial, or gender-based diversity.
AI Analysis
Wild Wings is a specialized natural history documentary centered on the Slimbridge Wild Fowl Trust. Because the subject matter is strictly avian, the film lacks the human character arcs and interpersonal dynamics required to evaluate social representation. The absence of human subjects means there is no presence of gender, race, or LGBTQ+ identities. This results in a technical lack of intersectional metrics rather than a deliberate attempt to promote specific social hierarchies. Ultimately, the film serves a purely educational and observational purpose regarding the preservation of wild fowl, making it a niche biological study rather than a social commentary.
Similar Movies
White Wilderness
1958
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.0 out of 10
Secrets of Life
1956
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.0 out of 10
The Living Desert
1953
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.0 out of 10
The Zoo
1961
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.0 out of 10
Bears
2004
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.0 out of 10
Pigeons in the Square
1982
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.0 out of 10
The Olympic Elk
1952
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.0 out of 10
Diving with Dolphins
2020
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.1 out of 10
Lost Worlds: Life in the Balance
2001
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 0.3 out of 10
The Dragons of Galapagos
1998
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 0.3 out of 10
The Vanishing Prairie
1954
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.1 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.