That Certain Thing
1928
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.4 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
Bunker Bean
1936
NRDirector
William Hamilton, Edward Killy
Runtime
67 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
A shy office worker becomes a hero when a fortune teller calls him another Napoleon.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
1.2/10
Minimal
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film follows a traditional romantic comedy structure. There is no evidence of non-cisnormative identities or narratives that critique heteronormativity.
Gender Representation
The story relies on a masculine arc where a shy male protagonist gains agency through external validation. This framework reinforces traditional gender roles.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The production appears to follow the homogeneous casting standards of the 1930s. There is no indication of a non-white or non-Anglo-Saxon majority cast.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The plot uses a fortune teller trope to catalyze the story. It promotes a standard individualistic success story rather than subversive social commentary.
Disability Representation
There is no evidence of characters with disabilities being portrayed with agency. The protagonist's shyness is treated as a personality trait rather than a neurodivergent experience.
Strengths
- The film provides a clear, classic 'zero-to-hero' character arc common in mid-century romantic comedies.
Areas for Improvement
- The narrative lacks intersectional depth and fails to represent diverse identities or non-traditional social structures.
- The film reinforces traditional gender roles and homogeneous casting standards typical of the 1930s.
AI Analysis
Bunker Bean is a product of the 1936 studio system, prioritizing conventional narrative structures and established social hierarchies. The film centers on a 'zero-to-hero' trajectory, focusing on a male protagonist's personal transformation to achieve social validation. The film lacks intersectional depth, adhering to the era's standard of homogeneous casting and traditional gender roles. It functions as a standard romantic comedy without attempting to disrupt the cultural norms of its time. Ultimately, the film offers a narrow view of heroism, driven by individualistic success and external prophecies rather than diverse or subversive perspectives.
Similar Movies
Jenny und der Herr im Frack
1941
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.4 out of 10
Niagara Falls
1941
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.1 out of 10
Hans officiella fästmö
1944
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.4 out of 10
The Prizefighter and the Lady
1933
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.2 out of 10
Expensive Husbands
1937
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.7 out of 10
The Big Pond
1930
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.4 out of 10
Miss Pacific Fleet
1935
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.5 out of 10
That Man's Here Again
1937
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.2 out of 10
Let’s Be Ritzy
1934
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.9 out of 10
No Exit
1930
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.8 out of 10
Sin Takes a Holiday
1930
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.8 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.