You are here:
Where Were You When the Lights Went Out?

Where Were You When the Lights Went Out?

1968

Director

Hy Averback

Runtime

89 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

When the Great Northeast Blackout of 1965 hit, millions of people were left in the dark, including Waldo Zane, a New York executive in the process of stealing a fortune from his company, and two people whose paths he's destined to cross, Broadway actress Margaret Garrison and her husband, Peter.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.1/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film operates within a conventional heteronormative framework. The narrative focuses on a central trio without any evidence of non-cisnormative identities.

Gender Representation

Fair

The story presents traditional gendered dynamics between a Broadway actress and her husband. Characters appear to function within the social expectations of the 1960s.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The cast appears centered on the dominant Anglo-Saxon demographic of the period. There is no evidence of a non-white majority cast or race-bent casting.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

Chaos is framed through farce rather than a critique of Western institutions. The protagonist's white-collar crime serves as a comedic plot device rather than a systemic critique.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There are no visible or invisible disabilities central to the narrative arc. No characters are utilized as plot devices regarding physical or mental health.

Strengths

  • The film utilizes the breakdown of social order during a blackout as an effective comedic engine.

Areas for Improvement

  • The narrative lacks representation of non-cisnormative identities or LGBTQ+ characters.
  • The cast lacks racial and ethnic diversity, reflecting a homogeneous demographic.
  • The film does not engage in systemic critiques of capitalism or Western institutions.

AI Analysis

This 1968 comedy functions as a traditional mid-century farce. It prioritizes situational humor and established social norms over the inclusion of intersectional identities or the disruption of hierarchies. The film reflects the homogeneous social structures of its era, focusing on a central trio within a conventional framework. It lacks intentional efforts to challenge Western structures or promote progressive social frameworks. Ultimately, the narrative adheres to the demographic status quo of the 1960s, offering a period-typical comedic experience without significant social subversion.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.