The Fugitives
1986
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.8 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
The Happening
1967
Director
Elliot Silverstein
Runtime
101 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
A group of young drifters kidnap wealthy businessman Roc Delmonico just for kicks. They keep him captive, demanding a ransom for his safe release. However there is no one - wife, Mafia associates or mother - willing to part with the $200,000 ransom. Demonico is dismayed that no one appears unduly concerned about his fate and joins forces with the kidnappers to plot his revenge, blackmailing his once nearest and dearest into parting with $3,000,000 in hush money.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
1.8/10
Minimal
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks any discernible presence of non-cisnormative or non-heteronormative identities. The social framework remains strictly heteronormative without exploring queer identity.
Gender Representation
Characters operate within traditional 1960s archetypes. The narrative does not subvert gender hierarchies or demonstrate a significant shift toward female agency.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The ensemble is predominantly homogeneous, reflecting the era's cinematic norms. There is a notable absence of characters of color in positions of agency.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film offers a moderate critique of human dominance through an ecological lens. It avoids explicit systemic critiques of Western or capitalist institutions.
Disability Representation
There is no visible or invisible representation of neurodivergence or physical disability. Characters are depicted through a lens of standard physical capability.
Strengths
- The film provides a moderate critique of human dominance and the vulnerability of civilization through an ecological lens.
Areas for Improvement
- The ensemble lacks ethnic diversity and characters of color in positions of agency.
- The narrative fails to represent neurodivergence, physical disability, or chronic illness.
- The film lacks any representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-heteronormative social frameworks.
- Gender roles remain tied to traditional 1960s archetypes without subverting masculine authority.
AI Analysis
The film functions as a traditional genre piece that reflects the demographic constraints of 1967. It focuses on a homogeneous demographic framework rather than challenging social hierarchies. The narrative centers on a white, middle-class demographic, reinforcing a traditional Western social baseline. It lacks intersectional storytelling or the intentional disruption of established social norms. While the plot explores the breakdown of social order and the failure of institutions, these elements are framed through external phenomena rather than a deconstruction of identity politics.
Similar Movies
For Whom the Bell Rings
1968
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.2 out of 10
Don't Raise the Bridge, Lower the River
1968
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.7 out of 10
The Big Operator
1976
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10
The Devil by the Tail
1969
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.2 out of 10
The Jerks
1987
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.7 out of 10
Too Many Crooks
1959
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.9 out of 10
Gangster Boss
1959
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10
The Naked Truth
1957
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.9 out of 10
I due vigili
1967
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.3 out of 10
Nothing But the Best
1964
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.9 out of 10
Fiasco in Milan
1959
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.3 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.