
Living Dangerously
1936

Representation Score
Minimal
1936
ApprovedDirector
George Marshall
Runtime
75 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetNew Showbiz Analysis
The film mirrors its era, sticking to the conventional social and narrative structures of 1930s Hollywood. It doesn't aim to challenge traditional themes or offer layered diversity. The storyline centers on professional ethics and legal exoneration, reinforcing established Western institutions. This focus restricts the scope for diverse viewpoints or critical analysis. Overall, the production follows mainstream narrative paths and clear moral lines, lacking in social subversion or varied representation.
Category Breakdown
The film doesn't include any queer identities or subtext. It assumes everyone is straight, fitting the typical 1930s Hollywood style.
The story focuses on a male protagonist's professional and legal standing. A central female character is involved in the conflict, but the power dynamics follow traditional period roles.
The cast seems uniform, showing the era's standard of depicting white, Western professionals. There's no sign of diverse casting to break historical norms.
This procedural drama highlights medical ethics and legal truth. It upholds Western institutional values without critiquing capitalism, religion, or the family unit.
An injured scientist's suffering serves as a plot device. It works as a narrative tool rather than a detailed look at disability.
Present on Screen
Limited or Absent
Official Synopsis
Injured scientist Eric Godfrey asks his protege to give him a fatal dose of opiates to end his misery. When he dies the doctor is accused of murder.

1936

1940

1929

1950

1963

1946

1929

1934
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.