
The Return of Maxim
1937

1939
Director
Grigori Kozintsev, Leonid Trauberg
Runtime
92 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
The final part of trilogy about the life of a young factory worker, Maxim. Following the Russian Revolution, Maksim is appointed state commissar in charge of the national bank. With great efforts, he learns the complexies of the banking trade and begins to fight off sabotaging underlings. Dymba, now a violent enemy of the Republic, tries to rob a wine store but is arrested with Maksim's help. Maksim also exposes a conspiracy of a group of tsarist officers who prepare an attempt against Lenin. He then joins the Red Army in its fight against the German occupation.
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks any evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. The story remains strictly focused on class struggle and the building of the state.
Gender Representation
Agency is concentrated in male figures like Maxim and Lenin. The film prioritizes masculine archetypes of strength and political leadership typical of the era's worker-hero.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative centers the agency of the Soviet proletariat against Western-colonialist frameworks. However, it lacks specific evidence of a multi-ethnic cast or diverse ethnic character arcs.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film excels at portraying the dismantling of Tsarist and capitalist institutions. It promotes a collectivist framework that replaces traditional religious and monarchical social orders.
Disability Representation
There is no evidence of characters with physical or neurodivergent disabilities being portrayed with agency or as central to the plot.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
The Vyborg Side is a quintessential piece of revolutionary cinema that prioritizes systemic upheaval over intersectional identity. Its narrative strength lies in the deconstruction of old-world hierarchies, specifically targeting Tsarist and capitalist structures. While the film succeeds in presenting a non-Western, collectivist social order, it operates within the rigid character archetypes of 1939. The focus on class-based identity leaves little room for the representation of gender, sexuality, or disability. Ultimately, the film is a study of political and social transformation. It achieves high marks for cultural disruption but remains limited by the era's emphasis on masculine, proletarian archetypes.

1937

1935

1934

1930

1926

1998

1927

1947

1935

1939

1935

1963
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.