You are here:
This Woman Is Dangerous

This Woman Is Dangerous

1952

NR

Director

Felix E. Feist

Runtime

100 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A crime gang leader is losing her sight, so while her lover goes into hiding, she checks in to the hospital for extensive surgery to recover her eyesight. There she is treated by a handsome young doctor. As expected not only does the doctor successfully open her eyes, he also opens her heart for him.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.8/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks LGBTQ+ characters or non-heteronormative identities. The romantic structure relies entirely on a traditional heterosexual dynamic between the lead woman and the doctor.

Gender Representation

Good

The protagonist disrupts mid-century archetypes by possessing significant agency and criminal autonomy. She drives the plot as a complex figure rather than a passive, domestic character.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The cast reflects a homogeneous social stratum typical of 1952 American cinema. There is a notable absence of racial or ethnic diversity in the casting.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The story utilizes moral relativism to explore the ambiguity of guilt. It moves away from rigid moralism toward a more situational understanding of human behavior.

Disability Representation

Fair

Visual impairment serves as a central plot catalyst linked to the protagonist's emotional arc. However, the resolution follows a traditional restorative medical arc.

Strengths

  • The protagonist possesses significant agency and criminal autonomy, challenging traditional gender hierarchies.
  • The narrative employs moral relativism, exploring the subjectivity of truth and guilt.
  • The female lead is a complex driver of the plot rather than a passive archetype.

Areas for Improvement

  • The cast lacks racial and ethnic diversity, reflecting limited 1950s casting standards.
  • The depiction of disability follows a predictable restorative arc through medical intervention.
  • There is no representation of LGBTQ+ identities or queer subtext.

AI Analysis

This film is a product of its 1952 era, characterized by a lack of demographic breadth and a homogeneous cast. It adheres to the casting conventions of the time, offering very little racial or ethnic variety. However, the film succeeds in subverting gendered expectations. By centering a 'dangerous' woman with criminal autonomy, it challenges the passive female archetypes common in mid-century noir. While the depiction of disability is tied to a restorative medical outcome, the film's embrace of moral ambiguity provides a sophisticated layer of character ethics that elevates the narrative.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.