You are here:
Killing Strangers

Killing Strangers

2013

Director

Jacob Secher Schulsinger, Nicolás Pereda

Runtime

63 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A series of auditions is taking place in a museum-like living room. Various men improvise or deliver prepared lines, rehearse gestures and slogans, aim guns, and collapse as if mortally wounded. The theme of revolution is repeatedly invoked. In between, there are scenes of a desert landscape. Three men seeking to join the Mexican Revolution at the beginning of the last century have lost their way. Conflicts smolder among them, water is running low, and mutual mistrust is beginning to take hold. Placing the reenactment of a possible historical event alongside the preparations for it serves to underline the theatricality of every cinematic account of history. Moreover, on a kind of playful meta-meta-level, the scenes in which the actors feel their way through set pieces from a Beatles song or standard battle slogans allow the viewer to witness the simultaneous construction and deconstruction of a collective myth of revolution.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.9/10

Good


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film explores the fluidity of identity through improvisation and performance. While it lacks explicit queer intimacy, its focus on non-normative social roles avoids rigid heteronormative archetypes.

Gender Representation

Good

Masculinity is presented as a theatrical construct rather than an inherent trait. By framing aggressive gestures within a domestic setting, the film deconstructs the traditional authority of the heroic male.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Good

The dual-narrative structure uses the Mexican Revolution to explore complex historical agency. It avoids monolithic ethnic portrayals, opting instead for a fragmented and nuanced perspective of historical struggle.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The work offers a sophisticated critique of institutionalized history and collective myths. It prioritizes a skeptical morality that challenges the power structures used to curate Western historical narratives.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no specific evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities. The narrative focus remains on performance and improvisation rather than disability.

Strengths

  • Deconstructs traditional masculine archetypes by presenting aggression as a rehearsed, theatrical gesture.
  • Provides a nuanced, non-dogmatic critique of Western historical narratives and revolutionary myths.
  • Avoids romanticized portrayals of ethnic struggle through a fragmented, realistic historical lens.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks explicit representation or narrative focus regarding physical or neurodivergent disabilities.
  • Does not provide clear, explicit depictions of queer intimacy or specific LGBTQ+ identities.

AI Analysis

Killing Strangers is a meta-cinematic inquiry that challenges the stability of historical and social identities. It succeeds by refusing cohesive storytelling, instead using a fragmented approach to deconstruct the myth of the revolutionary hero. The film effectively subverts traditional masculine leadership by placing performances of violence within a domestic, museum-like space. This juxtaposition strips authority from traditional archetypes. While the film excels at intellectual deconstruction and cultural critique, it lacks specific representation regarding disability. The focus remains primarily on the performative nature of gender and history.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.