New Showbiz

You are here:
When the Pheasants Pass

When the Pheasants Pass

1965

Director

Édouard Molinaro

Runtime

89 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Arsène Baudu and Hyacinthe, a pair of small-time crooks, fall prey to Alexandre Larsan-Bellac, who involves them (against their will) in high-profile swindling, but their success is quite limited. For starters they are deceived by Mrs. Paterson, a charming widow. Later on, Ribeiro, a Portuguese contractor and former victim of the two crooks, traces them and forces them to work on one of his building sites for damages. Just then, Larsan-Bellac resurfaces with plans to lure Ribeiro once again. —Guy Bellinger

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

2.7/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks LGBTQ+ characters or storylines. It operates within traditional social frameworks without engaging in queer themes or critiques of heteronormativity.

Gender Representation

Limited

Gender dynamics remain largely traditional within a French provincial setting. While Mrs. Paterson exerts influence as a charming widow, the film does not subvert gender hierarchies.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The cast is predominantly homogeneous, reflecting mid-1960s cinematic norms. The inclusion of Ribeiro, a Portuguese contractor, provides ethnic specificity without broader diverse casting.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The narrative focuses on the absurdity of human greed and swindling. It avoids critiques of Western institutions like religion or the family, adhering to standard comedic tropes.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no discernible focus on physical or neurodivergent disabilities. Characters are defined by their socioeconomic status and comedic roles rather than any visible or invisible disabilities.

Strengths

  • The character of Ribeiro introduces specific ethnic background through his Portuguese identity.
  • Mrs. Paterson provides a moment of female influence within the comedic framework.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks LGBTQ+ representation and queer themes.
  • The cast is predominantly homogeneous, lacking racial and ethnic diversity.
  • Gender dynamics follow traditional hierarchies without significant subversion.
  • There is no representation of physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

AI Analysis

This 1965 comedy is a product of its era, prioritizing character-driven situational irony over social commentary. The narrative centers on small-time crooks and their various deceptions, maintaining a traditional demographic profile. The film lacks intentionality regarding intersectional representation or the disruption of social hierarchies. It functions as a standard comedy of its time, focusing on individual greed rather than systemic critique. While specific ethnic backgrounds like Portuguese are mentioned, the ensemble remains largely homogeneous, and gender roles follow established provincial norms.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Movie poster for For 200 Grand, You Get Nothing Now

For 200 Grand, You Get Nothing Now

1982

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.1 out of 10

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.