The Centipede Is Tap Dancing
1977
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.5 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
For 200 Grand, You Get Nothing Now
1982
Director
Édouard Molinaro
Runtime
85 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
After getting screwed over by life (again), two losers decide that enough is enough. Using stolen ski masks and stolen toy guns, they take hostages in their local bank, holding them for ransom. Things go well until the hostages learn what's going on, and demand a piece of the action for themselves.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
3.1/10
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks any documented evidence of queer narratives or non-cisnormative identities. It focuses on class-based struggles rather than identity-based orientations.
Gender Representation
The narrative centers on the protagonists and their interactions within the bank. There is no evidence of subverting gender hierarchies or challenging systemic norms.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
As a localized French comedy, the film does not indicate an intersectional or diverse cast. The story prioritizes class dynamics over racial representation.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film offers a moderate critique of capitalist institutions. It depicts crime as a response to systemic economic failure and wealth inequity.
Disability Representation
There is no evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities driving the plot. The narrative does not integrate disability into its framework.
Strengths
- Provides a social satire regarding the inequity of wealth distribution.
- Offers a narrative shift where hostages gain agency against financial institutions.
Areas for Improvement
- Lacks intersectional complexity and diverse casting.
- Fails to explore identity-based subversion or diverse social perspectives.
AI Analysis
For 200 Grand, You Get Nothing Now is a traditional social comedy that uses a heist trope to explore economic frustration. The film's strength lies in its satirical look at systemic failure, where hostages reclaim agency by demanding a share of the ransom. However, the film remains narrow in its scope. It relies on class-based resentment rather than a multifaceted exploration of identity, leaving little room for intersectional complexity. Ultimately, the work functions as a critique of institutional stability but lacks intentional representation of diverse identities or social groups.
Similar Movies
Robbery at 3 O'clock
1962
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10
Don erre que erre
1970
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.7 out of 10
Robbery at 3 O'clock… and Half
2003
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.8 out of 10
The Policeman of the 16th Precinct
2008
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.9 out of 10
Bank Error in Your Favour
2009
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.4 out of 10
Los dinamiteros
1964
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.5 out of 10
At Home with the Rozes
2003
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.8 out of 10
The Fugitives
1986
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.8 out of 10
Out of It
1978
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.4 out of 10
The Wild Goose Chase
1975
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.9 out of 10
Lucky
2020
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.4 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.